Correction to: The mouse and ferret models for studying the novel avian-origin human influenza A (H7N9) virus.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Global meta-analysis of short-term associations between ambient temperature and pathogen-specific respiratory infections, 2004 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
   Pooled it
2. Structural characterization and antiviral activity of polysaccharide from Codonopsis pilosula.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  The mouse and ferret models for studying the novel avian-origin human influenza A (H7N9) virus.2013

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract