Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580742›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020

A fast, simple, and cost-effective method of expanding patient-derived xenograft mouse models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Zhenyang Liu, Michael Ho-Young Ahn, Tomohiro Kurokawa, Amy Ly, Gong Zhang, Fuyou Wang, Teppei Yamada, Ananthan Sadagopan, Jane Cheng, Cristina R Ferrone and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. ICIs-Related Cardiotoxicity in Different Types of Cancer.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Zhenyang LiuDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael Ho-Young AhnDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tomohiro KurokawaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Amy LyDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gong ZhangDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fuyou WangDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Teppei YamadaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ananthan SadagopanDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jane ChengDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Cristina R FerroneDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew S LissDivision of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kim C HonselmannDivision of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gregory R WojtkiewiczMouse Imaging Program, Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Soldano FerroneDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Xinhui WangDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. xwang30@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

T cell plasticity, fusion proteins and CAR T cell-based immunotherapy of head and neck cancerR01DE028172 · NIDCR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WANG, XINHUI · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Prevention of post-therapy breast cancer metastasisR01CA226981 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WANG, XINHUI · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Improving Radiation Therapy For Pancreatic CancerR21CA181851 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WANG, XINHUI · 2015 to 2016
$407k
IL-15 TRiKES-based specific immunotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaR03CA231766 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FERRONE, CRISTINA R., FERRONE, SOLDANO · 2018 to 2019
$177k
Safety and anti-tumor activity of B7-H3 CAR T cells in TNBCR03CA223886 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DOTTI, GIANPIETRO, FERRONE, SOLDANO · 2018 to 2019
$176k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226981NCI NIH HHS R01CA226981-01A1NCI NIH HHS R03 CA223886NCI NIH HHS R03 CA231766NCI NIH HHS R03CA231766NCI NIH HHS R21CA181851NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE028172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models of cancer have been recognized as better mouse models that recapitulate the characteristics of original malignancies including preserved tumor heterogeneity, lineage hierarchy, and tumor microenvironment. However, common challenges of PDX models are the significant time required for tumor expansion, reduced tumor take rates, and higher costs. Here, we describe a fast, simple, and cost-effective method of expanding PDX of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in mice.

methodsWe used two established frozen PDAC PDX tissues (derived from two different patients) and implanted them subcutaneously into SCID mice. After tissues reached 10-20 mm in diameter, we performed survival surgery on each mouse to harvest 90-95% of subcutaneous PDX (incomplete resection), allowing the remaining 5-10% of PDX to continue growing in the same mouse.

resultsWe expanded three consecutive passages (P1, P2, and P3) of PDX in the same mouse. Comparing the times required for in vivo expansion, P2 and P3 (expanded through incomplete resection) grew 26-60% faster than P1. Moreover, such expanded PDX tissues were successfully implanted orthotopically into mouse pancreases. Within 20 weeks using only 14 mice, we generated sufficient PDX tissue for future implantation of 200 mice. Our histology study confirmed that the morphologies of cancer cells and stromal structures were similar across all three passages of subcutaneous PDX and the orthotopic PDX and were reflective of the original patient tumors.

conclusionsTaking advantage of incomplete resection of tumors associated with high local recurrence, we established a fast method of PDAC PDX expansion in mice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, SCIDNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTumor MicroenvironmentXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysOrthotopic PDX mouse modelPDAC PDXPDX expansionSubcutaneous PDX mouse model

Identifiers

PMID32580742
PMCPMC7315507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.