Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580716›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Disrupted brain network dynamics and cognitive functions in methamphetamine use disorder: insights from EEG microstates.

Tianzhen Chen, Hang Su, Na Zhong, Haoye Tan, Xiaotong Li, Yiran Meng, Chunmei Duan, Congbin Zhang, Juwang Bao, Ding Xu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fusion Model Using Resting Neurophysiological Data to Help Mass Screening of Methamphetamine Use Disorder.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tianzhen ChenShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Hang SuShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Na ZhongShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Haoye TanShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Xiaotong LiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Yiran MengYunnan Institute on Drug Dependence, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Chunmei DuanYunnan Institute on Drug Dependence, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Congbin ZhangYunnan Institute on Drug Dependence, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Juwang BaoInstitute of Higher Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Ding XuShanghai Bureau of Drug Rehabilitation Administration, Shanghai, China.
Weidong SongShanghai Bureau of Drug Rehabilitation Administration, Shanghai, China.
Jixue ZouDepartment of Health, Yunnan Bureau of Drug Rehabilitation Administration, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Tao LiuYunnan Third Compulsory Drug Dependence Rehablitation Center Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Qingqing ZhanYunnan Third Compulsory Drug Dependence Rehablitation Center Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Haifeng JiangShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China. dragonjhf@hotmail.com.
Min ZhaoShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.

Funding

Clinical Research Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine DLY201818Municipal Human Resources Development Program for Outstanding Young Talents in Medical and Health Sciences in Shanghai 2017YQ013National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1310400National Nature Science Foundation 81501148National Nature Science Foundation 81601164National Nature Science Foundation 81771436National Nature Science Foundation 81801319National Nature Science Foundation U1502228Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader 17XD1403300Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Mental Health 19MC1911100Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders 13DZ2260500Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission 2017ZZ02021Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2018SHZDZX05Shanghai Science and Technology Committee 18411961200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysfunction in brain network dynamics has been found to correlate with many psychiatric disorders. However, there is limited research regarding resting electroencephalogram (EEG) brain network and its association with cognitive process for patients with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). This study aimed at using EEG microstate analysis to determine whether brain network dynamics in patients with MUD differ from those of healthy controls (HC).

methodsA total of 55 MUD patients and 27 matched healthy controls were included for analysis. The resting brain activity was recorded by 64-channel electroencephalography. EEG microstate parameters and intracerebral current sources of each EEG microstate were compared between the two groups. Generalized linear regression model was used to explore the correlation between significant microstates with drug history and cognitive functions.

resultsMUD patients showed lower mean durations of the microstate classes A and B, and a higher global explained variance of the microstate class C. Besides, MUD patients presented with different current density power in microstates A, B, and C relative to the HC. The generalized linear model showed that MA use frequency is negatively correlated with the MMD of class A. Further, the generalized linear model showed that MA use frequency, scores of Two-back task, and the error rate of MA word are correlated with the MMD and GEV of class B, respectively.

conclusionsIntracranial current source densities of resting EEG microstates are disrupted in MUD patients, hence causing temporal changes in microstate topographies, which are correlated with attention bias and history of drug use.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBrainCognition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMethamphetamineMethamphetamineAttention biasBrain network dynamicsDrug use historyEEG microstateMethamphetamine use disordersLORETA

Identifiers

PMID32580716
PMCPMC7315471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.