Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580703›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Organised and opportunistic prevention in primary health care: estimation of missed opportunities by population based health interview surveys in Hungary.

János Sándor, Ildikó Tokaji, Nouh Harsha, Magor Papp, Róza Ádány, Árpád Czifra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

János SándorDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai26, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary. sandor.janos@sph.unideb.hu.
Ildikó TokajiDepartment of Life Quality, Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Keleti Károly 5-7, Budapest, 1024, Hungary.
Nouh HarshaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai26, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.
Magor PappDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai26, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.
Róza ÁdányDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai26, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.
Árpád CzifraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, Kassai26, Debrecen, 4026, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HUHungarian Central Statistical Office · HU

Funding

European Union and the European Regional Development Fund GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00005Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (HU) MTA 11003, 2006TKI227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovement of preventive services for adults can be achieved by opportunistic or organised methods in primary care. The unexploited opportunities of these approaches were estimated by our investigation.

methodsData from the Hungarian implementation of European Health Interview Surveys in 2009 (N = 4709) and 2014 (N = 5352) were analysed. Proportion of subjects used interventions in target group (screening for hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and influenza vaccination) within a year were calculated. Taking into consideration recommendations for the frequency of intervention, numbers of missed interventions among patients visited a general practitioner in a year and among patients did not visit a general practitioner in a year were calculated in order to describe missed opportunities that could be utilised by opportunistic or organised approaches. Numbers of missed interventions were estimated for the entire population of the country and for an average-sized general medical practice.

resultsImplementation ratio were 66.8% for blood pressure measurement among subjects above 40 years and free of diagnosed hypertension; 63.5% for checking blood glucose among adults above 45 and overweighed and free of diagnosed diabetes mellitus; and 19.1% for vaccination against seasonal influenza. There were 4.1 million interventions implemented a year in Hungary, most of the (3.8 million) among adults visited general practitioner in a year. The number of missed interventions was 4.5 million a year; mostly (3.4 million) among persons visited general practitioner in a year. For Hungary, the opportunistic and organised missed opportunities were estimated to be 561,098, and 1,150,321 for hypertension screening; 363,270, and 227,543 for diabetes mellitus screening; 2,784,072, and 380,033 for influenza vaccination among the < 60 years old high risk subjects, and 3,029,700 and 494,150 for influenza vaccination among more than 60 years old adults, respectively. By implementing all missed services, the workload in an average-sized general medical practice would be increased by 12-13 opportunistic and 4-5 organised interventions a week.

conclusionsThe studied interventions are much less used than recommended. The opportunistic missed opportunities is prevailing for influenza vaccination, and the organised one is for hypertension screening. The two approaches have similar significance for diabetes mellitus screening.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHypertensionInfluenza, HumanPreventive Health ServicesDiagnostic Screening ProgramsHealth Services MisuseHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Care ManagementPrimary Health CareVaccinationDiabetes mellitus screeningHypertension screeningInfluenza vaccinationOpportunistic preventionOrganised preventionPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID32580703
PMCPMC7315493
OpenAlexW3037976785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.