Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580504›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Artificial Sweeteners Disrupt Tight Junctions and Barrier Function in the Intestinal Epithelium through Activation of the Sweet Taste Receptor, T1R3.

Aparna Shil, Oluwatobi Olusanya, Zaynub Ghufoor, Benjamin Forson, Joanne Marks, Havovi Chichger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Biological and Behavioral Responses ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aparna ShilBiomedical Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
Oluwatobi OlusanyaLondon Epithelial Group, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Zaynub GhufoorLondon Epithelial Group, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Benjamin ForsonBiomedical Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
Joanne MarksLondon Epithelial Group, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-2477
Havovi ChichgerBiomedical Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-7583
Anglia Ruskin University · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Diabetes UK 15/0005284Kidney Research UK intercalated degree award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breakdown of the intestinal epithelial barrier and subsequent increase in intestinal permeability can lead to systemic inflammatory diseases and multiple-organ failure. Nutrition impacts the intestinal barrier, with dietary components such as gluten increasing permeability. Artificial sweeteners are increasingly consumed by the general public in a range of foods and drinks. The sweet taste receptor (T1R3) is activated by artificial sweeteners and has been identified in the intestine to play a role in incretin release and glucose transport; however, T1R3 has not been previously linked to intestinal permeability. Here, the intestinal epithelial cell line, Caco-2, was used to study the effect of commonly-consumed artificial sweeteners, sucralose, aspartame and saccharin, on permeability. At high concentrations, aspartame and saccharin were found to induce apoptosis and cell death in intestinal epithelial cells, while at low concentrations, sucralose and aspartame increased epithelial barrier permeability and down-regulated claudin 3 at the cell surface. T1R3 knockdown was found to attenuate these effects of artificial sweeteners. Aspartame induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production to cause permeability and claudin 3 internalization, while sweetener-induced permeability and oxidative stress was rescued by the overexpression of claudin 3. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that the artificial sweeteners sucralose, aspartame, and saccharin exert a range of negative effects on the intestinal epithelium through the sweet taste receptor T1R3.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisAspartameCaco-2 CellsClaudin-3ClaudinsGene ExpressionGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOxidative StressPermeabilityReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAspartameclaudin 15Claudin-3ClaudinsCLDN3 protein, humanCldn3 protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSucroseSweetening Agentstaste receptors, type 1trichlorosucroseCaco-2claudinintestinal epitheliumpermeabilitysweeteners

Identifiers

PMID32580504
PMCPMC7353258
OpenAlexW3036305771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.