ArticleNutrients2020
Strategies to Improve Health Communication: Can Health Professionals be Heroes?
Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of chat GPT for sentiment and readability analysis of nutrition articles in legacy media.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Cracking the Code: Adolescent Insights on TikTok Health Information Videos Produced by University Health Students.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Article
- The interaction between future food considerations, regulation of eating behaviors, sense of purpose, and social media consciousness among college students: a study on mediation effects and network analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Conveying Sport Nutrition Information in YouTube Videos: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Dietary Advice and Ways of Communication.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
- Promoting youth well-being: a qualitative study of Finnish YouTubers' mental health content.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Descriptive analysis of TikTok content on vaccination in Arabic.AIMS public health · 2025Article
- Helpful or harmful? Navigating the impact of social media influencers' health advice: insights from health expert content creators.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Review
- Characterizing the Discourse of Popular Diets to Describe Information Dispersal and Identify Leading Voices, Interaction, and Themes of Mental Health: Social Network Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Young Adults' Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Process Evaluation of the 'No Money No Time' Healthy Eating Website Promoted Using Social Marketing Principles. A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Influencing Factors of Nutrition and Diet Health Knowledge Dissemination Using the WeChat Official Account in Health Promotion.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Communicating evidence-based nutrition messages to the public is challenging and is often in conflict with popular opinions, particularly from social media influencers (SMIs). In order to increase engagement with nutrition professionals (NPs) on social media, we aimed to explore young adults' perceptions of the authenticity and trustworthiness of SMIs and NPs Instagram posts. A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to students (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.