Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580479›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Blending Gelatin and Cellulose Nanofibrils: Biocomposites with Tunable Degradability and Mechanical Behavior.

Elisabetta Campodoni, Margherita Montanari, Samuele M Dozio, Ellinor B Heggset, Silvia Panseri, Monica Montesi, Anna Tampieri, Kristin Syverud, Monica Sandri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabetta CampodoniInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-2921
Margherita MontanariInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Samuele M DozioInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Ellinor B HeggsetRISE PFI, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8876-8898
Silvia PanseriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8099-7132
Monica MontesiInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Anna TampieriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Kristin SyverudRISE PFI, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-3637
Monica SandriInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics-National Research Council (CNR), 48018 Faenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5782-3137
Institute of Science and Technology for Ceramics · ITNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

Research Council of Norway Grant no. 228147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies show how biomaterial properties like stiffness, mechanical stimulation and surface topography can influence cellular functions and direct stem cell differentiation. In this work, two different natural materials, gelatin (Gel) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), were combined to design suitable 3D porous biocomposites for soft-tissue engineering. Gel was selected for its well-assessed high biomimicry that it shares with collagen, from which it derives, while the CNFs were chosen as structural reinforcement because of their exceptional mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Three different compositions of Gel and CNFs, i.e., with weight ratios of 75:25, 50:50 and 25:75, were studied. The biocomposites were morphologically characterized and their total- and macro- porosity assessed, proving their suitability for cell colonization. In general, the pores were larger and more isotropic in the biocomposites compared to the pure materials. The influence of freeze-casting and dehydrothermal treatment (DHT) on mechanical properties, the absorption ability and the shape retention were evaluated. Higher content of CNFs gave higher swelling, and this was attributed to the pore structure. Cross-linking between CNFs and Gel using DHT was confirmed. The Young's modulus increased significantly by adding the CNFs to Gel with a linear relationship with respect to the CNF amounts. Finally, the biocomposites were characterized in vitro by testing cell colonization and growth through a quantitative cell viability analysis performed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Additionally, the cell viability analysis was performed by the means of a Live/Dead test with Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). All the biocomposites had higher cytocompatibility compared to the pure materials, Gel and CNFs.

Indexed as

cell-tissue interactiongelatinnanocellulosepolymer blendssoft-tissue

Identifiers

PMID32580479
PMCPMC7353106
OpenAlexW3036617115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.