Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580452›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Characterization of Silica Exposure during Manufacturing of Artificial Stone Countertops.

Mariella Carrieri, Carly Guzzardo, Daniel Farcas, Lorenzo G Cena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. From Engineered Stone Slab to Silicosis: A Synthesis of Exposure Science and Medical Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hazardous dusts from the fabrication of countertop: a review.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2023
    Review
  16. Characterization of Si and SiOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariella CarrieriDepartment of Cardiologic, Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Carly GuzzardoDepartment of Health, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, PA 19383, USA.
Daniel FarcasDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3536-917X
Lorenzo G CenaDepartment of Health, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, PA 19383, USA.
West Chester University · USUniversity of Padua · ITWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial stone is increasing in popularity in construction applications, including commercial and residential countertops. Eco-friendliness, durability, and resistance to staining, make artificial stone attractive to consumers. Health concerns have arisen during manufacturing of artificial stone due to increased incidence of silicosis after relatively short exposure. Three artificial stone samples (A, B, and C) and one natural granite sample were subjected to cutting and grinding in a controlled environment. Gravimetric analysis, X-Ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy were employed to determine crystalline silica concentrations and particle morphology of bulk and respirable particles. Silica content of bulk dust from artificial samples A and B was 91%, sample C was <10%, while granite was 31%. Silica percent in the respirable fraction for samples A and B was 53% and 54%, respectively, while sample C was <5% and granite was 8%. Number concentrations for samples A and B were mainly in the nano-fraction, indicating potential for translocation of silica particles to other organs outside of the lungs. Respirable dust concentrations inside the chamber were well above Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards for all materials, indicating that confined-space exposures require ventilation to lower risks of acute silicosis regardless of the nature of the stone.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalManufacturing and Industrial FacilitiesOccupational ExposureSilicon DioxideSilicosisDustHumansInhalation ExposureVentilationAir Pollutants, OccupationalDustSilicon DioxidebenchtopscountertopscrystallinegrindingmanufacturingrespirableSilica

Identifiers

PMID32580452
PMCPMC7345731
OpenAlexW3035788697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.