ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Robust Plug-and-Play Joint Axis Estimation Using Inertial Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking Creative Movement with Inertial Technology.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- DIODEM - A Diverse Inertial and Optical Dataset of kinEmatic chain Motion.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A Practical Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Method for Upper Limb Inertial Motion Capture in a Clinical Setting.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Article
- Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Comparison for Sport-Specific Motion Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Self-Calibrating Magnetometer-Free Inertial Motion Tracking of 2-DoF Joints.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effects of Dynamic IMU-to-Segment Misalignment Error on 3-DOF Knee Angle Estimation in Walking and Running.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Error-State Kalman Filter Method for Estimating Human Lower-Limb Kinematics during Various Walking Gaits.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Validation of Non-Restrictive Inertial Gait Analysis of Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Clinical Settings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Body-Worn IMU-Based Human Hip and Knee Kinematics Estimation during Treadmill Walking.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reference in-vitro dataset for inertial-sensor-to-bone alignment applied to the tibiofemoral joint.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Inertial Sensors-Applications and Challenges in a Nutshell.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Human and Animal Motion Tracking Using Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Logical-Linguistic Model of Diagnostics of Electric Drives with Sensors Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Inertial motion capture relies on accurate sensor-to-segment calibration. When two segments are connected by a hinge joint, for example in human knee or finger joints as well as in many robotic limbs, then the joint axis vector must be identified in the intrinsic sensor coordinate systems. Methods for estimating the joint axis using accelerations and angular rates of arbitrary motion have been proposed, but the user must perform sufficiently informative motion in a predefined initial time window to accomplish complete identifiability. Another drawback of state of the art methods is that the user has no way of knowing if the calibration was successful or not. To achieve plug-and-play calibration, it is therefore important that 1) sufficiently informative data can be extracted even if large portions of the data set consist of non-informative motions, and 2) the user knows when the calibration has reached a sufficient level of accuracy. In the current paper, we propose a novel method that achieves both of these goals. The method combines acceleration- and angular rate information and finds a globally optimal estimate of the joint axis. Methods for sample selection, that overcome the limitation of a dedicated initial calibration time window, are proposed. The sample selection allows estimation to be performed using only a small subset of samples from a larger data set as it deselects non-informative and redundant measurements. Finally, an uncertainty quantification method that assures validity of the estimated joint axis parameters, is proposed. Experimental validation of the method is provided using a mechanical joint performing a large range of motions. Angular errors in the order of 2 ∘ were achieved using 125-1000 selected samples. The proposed method is the first truly plug-and-play method that overcome the need for a specific calibration phase and, regardless of the user's motions, it provides an accurate estimate of the joint axis as soon as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.