Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580309›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Bone Mineral Density of Femur and Lumbar and the Relation between Fat Mass and Lean Mass of Adolescents: Based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES) from 2008 to 2011.

Aram Kim, Seunghui Baek, Seyeon Park, Jieun Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Big Data, Decision Models, and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Big Data, Decision Models, and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aram KimDepartment of Sport Leisure, Sungshin Women's University, Bomun-ro 34da-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02844, Korea.
Seunghui BaekDepartment of Health Exercise Management, Sungshin Women's University, Bomun-ro 34da-gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02844, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-2546
Seyeon ParkDepartment of Nursing Health Institute of Technology, 21 Chungjeong-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34504, Korea.
Jieun ShinLiberal Arts, Woosuk University, 443, Samnye-ro, Samnye-eup, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do 55338, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is most important to reach the maximum bone density in the childhood period to prevent developing osteoporosis; it is widely known that increased body weight has a positive correlation with bone density and that even though both the fat mass and lean mass have a significant impact on bone density, the latter mass has more importance for adults. Therefore, the study analyzed to identify the relationship between bone density and both fat mass and lean mass of Korean adolescents. Subjects were chosen among 21,303 people from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHNES) between 2008 and 2011 that took a bone density checkup; as a result, 1454 teenagers aged between 12 and 18 were selected. Data analysis was performed in SAS ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) following the KNHNES and the weighted complex sample analysis was conducted; body fat mass and lean mass were divided into quintile groups, and to figure out the differences in bone density that were analyzed in six models adjusted by body weight (kg) and walking (yes/no), muscle strengthening exercises (yes/no), nutrition (intake of ca (g), and serum vitamin D (ng/mL)). Then, the generalized linear model (GLM) and trend test were conducted for each gender with a significance level of 0.05. The bone density differences of fat mass and lean mass were analyzed. The result of Model 6 considering all correction variables is as follows; in the case of male adolescents, the total femur and lumbar spine showed a significant difference (F = 13.120,

Indexed as

Bone DensityNutrition SurveysAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentBody CompositionChildFemaleFemur NeckHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleRepublic of Koreaadolescentsbig databone mineral densityfemurlumbar

Identifiers

PMID32580309
PMCPMC7345079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.