Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580191›Full record

ArticleCerebrovascular diseases extra2020

Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Tandem Carotid Occlusions: Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort.

Santiago Fernández Menéndez, Eduardo Murias Quintana, Pedro Vega Valdés, Edison Morales Deza, Elena López-Cancio, Lorena Benavente Fernández, Montserrat González Delgado, Maria Rico-Santos, Sergio Calleja Puerta, Davinia Larrosa Campo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebrovascular diseases extra, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Santiago Fernández MenéndezService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Eduardo Murias QuintanaService of Radiology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Pedro Vega ValdésService of Radiology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Edison Morales DezaService of Radiology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Elena López-CancioService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Lorena Benavente FernándezService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Montserrat González DelgadoService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Maria Rico-SantosService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Sergio Calleja PuertaService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
Davinia Larrosa CampoService of Neurology, University Hospital "Central de Asturias" and ISPA, Oviedo, Spain, davinialc@gmail.com.
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute ischemic strokes with tandem occlusions, which represent 10-20% of all ischemic strokes, have a particularly poor prognosis. Since emergent treatment of tandem lesions has not been specifically addressed in randomized trials, there is an absence of standardized management.

objectiveWe sought to assess the efficacy and safety of acute endovascular treatment in stroke due to tandem occlusions in our center and compare the results with previous reports.

methodsFrom a prospective registry we analyzed data of 99 consecutive patients (males: 77.7%, mean age ± SD: 67.5 ± 9.5 years) with stroke due to tandem occlusions who underwent treatment with emergent carotid stenting and intracranial mechanical thrombectomy. Successful recanalization was defined as a TICI score of 2b-3 and a good functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale score ≤2 at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was considered when associated with worsening on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (≥4 points).

resultsA successful recanalization rate was achieved in 87.8 and 48.5% of the patients had a good functional outcome. sICH and mortality rates were 12.1 and 20.2%, respectively, and 21.2% of the patients received combined treatment with intravenous thrombolysis, which did not affect neither the prognosis nor the recanalization or sICH rates. The time from symptom onset to recanalization and the degree of recanalization were the main factors associated with prognosis and the occurrence of sICH.

conclusionsOur results suggest that endovascular treatment with emergent carotid stenting and intracranial thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke due to tandem occlusions is an effective and safe procedure.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonThrombectomyAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisDatabases, FactualDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRisk FactorsCarotid stentingIschemic strokeMechanical thrombectomyTandem occlusion

Identifiers

PMID32580191
PMCPMC7383215
OpenAlexW3037380105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.