Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32580098›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2020

Targeted nanoparticles towards increased L cell stimulation as a strategy to improve oral peptide delivery in incretin-based diabetes treatment.

Yining Xu, Herlinde De Keersmaecker, Kevin Braeckmans, Stefaan De Smedt, Patrice D Cani, Véronique Préat, Ana Beloqui

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Formulation of protein-loaded nanoparticles via freeze-drying.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Article
  11. Gut hormone stimulation as a therapeutic approach in oral peptide delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yining XuUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Herlinde De KeersmaeckerGhent University, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory for General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Ghent University, Center for Advanced Light Microscopy, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Kevin BraeckmansGhent University, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory for General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Ghent University, Center for Advanced Light Microscopy, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Stefaan De SmedtGhent University, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory for General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Ghent University, Center for Advanced Light Microscopy, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Patrice D CaniUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Metabolism and Nutrition Research Group, WELBIO (Walloon Excellence in Life Sciences and BIOtechnology), 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Véronique PréatUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Ana BeloquiUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Advanced Drug Delivery and Biomaterials, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: ana.beloqui@uclouvain.be.
Ghent University · BEUCLouvain · BEWalloon Excellence in Lifesciences and Biotechnology · BE

Funding

European Research Council 850997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of therapeutic peptides via the oral route remains one of biggest challenges in the pharmaceutical industry. Recently, we have described an alternative improved drug delivery system for peptide delivery via the oral route, consisting of a lipidic nanocapsule. Despite the striking effects observed, it is still essential to develop strategies to strengthen the nanocarriers' glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretory effect of the nanocarrier and/or prolong its antidiabetic effect in vivo to facilitate its translation into the clinic. For this purpose, we developed and compared different fatty acid-targeted lipid and polymeric nanoparticles and evaluated the L cell stimulation induced by the nanocarriers in murine L cells in vitro and in normal healthy mice in vivo. We further examined the antidiabetic effect in vivo in an obese/diabetic mouse model induced by high-fat diet feeding and examined the effect of the oral administration frequency. Among the tested nanocarriers, only lipid-based nanocarriers that were surface-modified with DSPE-PEG

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2NanoparticlesAnimalsBlood GlucoseIncretinsInsulinL CellsMicePeptidesBlood GlucoseIncretinsInsulinPeptidesGLP-1L cellsLipid nanocapsulesOral peptide deliveryTargeted nanocarriersType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID32580098
PMCPMC7116363
OpenAlexW3036327439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.