Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579892›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2021

Impact of Intraocular Pressure Control on Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss in a Large Clinical Population.

Alessandro A Jammal, Atalie C Thompson, Eduardo B Mariottoni, Tais Estrela, Leonardo S Shigueoka, Samuel I Berchuck, Felipe A Medeiros

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intraocular pressure measurement in keratoconus: a narrative review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro A JammalVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Ophthalmology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Atalie C ThompsonVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Eduardo B MariottoniVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Tais EstrelaVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Leonardo S ShigueokaVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Ophthalmology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Samuel I BerchuckVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Statistical Science and Forge, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Felipe A MedeirosVision, Imaging, and Performance Laboratory, Duke Eye Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: felipe.medeiros@duke.edu.
Duke University · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

The BCI (Brain Computer Interface) Glaucoma Study: Objective Home-Based Detection of Progressive Visual Function Loss in GlaucomaR01EY029885 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ASRANI, SANJAY, MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2019 to 2022
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the impact of intraocular pressure (IOP) control on rates of change of spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in a large clinical population.

designRetrospective cohort study.

participantsA total of 85 835 IOP measurements and 60 223 SD-OCT tests from 14 790 eyes of 7844 patients.

methodsData were extracted from the Duke Glaucoma Registry, a large database of electronic medical records of patients with glaucoma and suspected disease followed over time at the Duke Eye Center and satellite clinics. All records from patients with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up and at least 2 good-quality SD-OCT scans and 2 clinical visits with Goldmann applanation tonometry were included. Eyes were categorized according to the frequency of visits with IOP below cutoffs of 21 mmHg, 18 mmHg, and 15 mmHg over time. Rates of change for global RNFL thickness were obtained using linear mixed models and classified as slow if change was slower than -1.0 μm/year; moderate if between -1.0 and -2.0 μm/year; and fast if faster than -2.0 μm/year. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, race, diagnosis, central corneal thickness, follow-up time, and baseline disease severity.

main outcome measuresRates of change in SD-OCT RNFL thickness according to levels of IOP control.

resultsEyes had a mean follow-up of 3.5±1.9 years. Average rate of change in RNFL thickness was -0.68±0.59 μm/year. Each 1 mmHg higher mean IOP was associated with 0.05 μm/year faster RNFL loss (P < 0.001) after adjustment for potentially confounding variables. For eyes that had fast progression, 41% of them had IOP <21 mmHg in all visits during follow-up, whereas 20% of them had all visits with IOP <18 mmHg, but only 9% of them had all visits with IOP <15 mmHg.

conclusionsIntraocular pressure was significantly associated with rates of progressive RNFL loss in a large clinical population. Eyes with stricter IOP control over follow-up visits had a smaller chance of exhibiting fast deterioration. Our findings may assist clinicians in establishing target pressures in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceRetinal Ganglion CellsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTonometry, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID32579892
PMCPMC7750282
OpenAlexW3036853613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.