Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579780›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2020

The CHK1 inhibitor MU380 significantly increases the sensitivity of human docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer cells to gemcitabine through the induction of mitotic catastrophe.

Stanislav Drápela, Prashant Khirsariya, Wytske M van Weerden, Radek Fedr, Tereza Suchánková, Diana Búzová, Jan Červený, Aleš Hampl, Martin Puhr, William R Watson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stanislav DrápelaDepartment of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-9972
Prashant KhirsariyaInternational Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic.
Wytske M van WeerdenDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0324-4804
Radek FedrDepartment of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tereza SuchánkováDepartment of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-6497
Diana BúzováDepartment of Adaptive Biotechnologies, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-0546
Jan ČervenýDepartment of Adaptive Biotechnologies, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5046-3105
Aleš HamplInternational Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8963-9235
Martin PuhrDepartment of Urology, Experimental Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-9653
William R WatsonSchool of Medicine, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0587-6947
Zoran CuligInternational Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5001-6153
Lumír KrejčíInternational Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4732-1405
Kamil ParuchInternational Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomolecular and Cellular Engineering, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9502-3173
Karel SoučekDepartment of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-8150
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZMasaryk University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute · CZInnsbruck Medical University · ATErasmus MC · NLUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As treatment options for patients with incurable metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are considerably limited, novel effective therapeutic options are needed. Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) is a highly conserved protein kinase implicated in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway that prevents the accumulation of DNA damage and controls regular genome duplication. CHK1 has been associated with prostate cancer (PCa) induction, progression, and lethality; hence, CHK1 inhibitors SCH900776 (also known as MK-8776) and the more effective SCH900776 analog MU380 may have clinical applications in the therapy of PCa. Synergistic induction of DNA damage with CHK1 inhibition represents a promising therapeutic approach that has been tested in many types of malignancies, but not in chemoresistant mCRPC. Here, we report that such therapeutic approach may be exploited using the synergistic action of the antimetabolite gemcitabine (GEM) and CHK1 inhibitors SCH900776 and MU380 in docetaxel-resistant (DR) mCRPC. Given the results, both CHK1 inhibitors significantly potentiated the sensitivity to GEM in a panel of chemo-naïve and matched DR PCa cell lines under 2D conditions. MU380 exhibited a stronger synergistic effect with GEM than clinical candidate SCH900776. MU380 alone or in combination with GEM significantly reduced spheroid size and increased apoptosis in all patient-derived xenograft 3D cultures, with a higher impact in DR models. Combined treatment induced premature mitosis from G1 phase resulting in the mitotic catastrophe as a prestage of apoptosis. Finally, treatment by MU380 alone, or in combination with GEM, significantly inhibited tumor growth of both PC339-DOC and PC346C-DOC xenograft models in mice. Taken together, our data suggest that metabolically robust and selective CHK1 inhibitor MU380 can bypass docetaxel resistance and improve the effectiveness of GEM in DR mCRPC models. This approach might allow for dose reduction of GEM and thereby minimize undesired toxicity and may represent a therapeutic option for patients with incurable DR mCRPC.

Indexed as

MitosisAnimalsCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCheckpoint Kinase 1DeoxycytidineDocetaxelDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGemcitabineHumansMaleMice, SCIDPiperidinesProstatic NeoplasmsPyrazolesCheckpoint Kinase 1CHEK1 protein, humanDeoxycytidineDocetaxelGemcitabineMU380PiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidinescastration-resistant prostate cancercheckpoint kinase 1docetaxel resistancegemcitabinemitotic catastropheMU380

Identifiers

PMID32579780
PMCPMC7530791
OpenAlexW3037754297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.