Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579752›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2020

A Risk Analysis Framework for Prioritizing and Managing Biosecurity Threats.

Gilberto Montibeller, L Alberto Franco, Ashley Carreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk Assessment in Peacekeeping: Are Visual Sparse Models Transparent?Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gilberto MontibellerManagement Science and Operations Group, School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-080X
L Alberto FrancoManagement Science and Operations Group, School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6231-8565
Ashley CarrerasCollege of Business, AlFaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3734-6622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing need to manage biosecurity threats, such as diseases, zoonoses, and biological weapons, poses serious challenges for risk analysts and policymakers. These threats are large in number, can occur concurrently, and may cause multiple tangible and intangible impacts. They often have an emerging nature, exacerbated by incomplete evidence about their probability of occurrence and potential impacts. There is also a limited amount of time and resources available to evaluate the risks posed by each threat, and it is difficult to learn from past projects. On the other hand, there is also a need to provide policymakers with transparent and consistent threat prioritizations, together with evidence-based recommendations. In response to these challenges, we propose a risk analysis framework for the prioritization and management of biosecurity threats. The framework encompasses key design choices that analysts may use in risk analysis projects along three dimensions: risk support, risk group, and risk organization. The framework has prescriptive value, as a design tool to inform risk analysis projects in this context, along with descriptive value, as a learning tool to understand past projects. We applied the framework prescriptively in two biosecurity threat prioritization projects for the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and illustrate its descriptive value by reporting our experience of these projects as in-depth case studies. Overall, the proposed framework provides important insights into the impact of different design choices on the success of risk analysis projects for biosecurity threat prioritizations.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAnimalsHumansProbabilitySecurity MeasuresBiosecurity threatsdecision support systemshealth risksrisk managementrisk prioritization

Identifiers

PMID32579752
PMCPMC10645577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.