Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579608›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparison of one-year results of photodynamic therapy combined with ranibizumab or aflibercept for treating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Arisa Ito, Maiko Maruyama-Inoue, Yoko Kitajima, Shimpei Sato, Tatsuya Inoue, Shin Yamane, Kazuaki Kadonosono

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of 3-year outcomes of photodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in a European cohort.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arisa ItoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5518-1078
Maiko Maruyama-InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoko KitajimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shimpei SatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2940-9734
Tatsuya InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Shin YamaneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuaki KadonosonoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the 1-year visual outcomes and anatomical responses of patients who received photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections with those of patients who received PDT combined with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections for treating polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

methodsWe retrospectively studied all treatment-naïve patients with PCV who received PDT combined with either IVR or IVA. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), the number of additional injections, and the presence of polypoidal lesions, as indicated by indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), during 1 year were evaluated.

resultsForty-four eyes were assessed at the 1-year follow-up examination. Of these, 23 were treated with PDT combined with IVR (PDT/IVR group), and 21 were treated with PDT combined with IVA (PDT/IVA group). In both groups, BCVA was shown to be significantly improved 1 year after the initial treatment. CMT and CCT were also significantly decreased after 1 year. There were no significant differences in the changes in BCVA or CMT between the two groups. However, the change in CCT in the PDT/IVA group was significantly larger than that of the PDT/IVR group (P < 0.001). The mean number of additional injections was 0.78 ± 0.21 in the PDT/IVR group and 0.57 ± 0.21 in the PDT/IVA group with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.45). The polyp regression rate at 12 months was 78.2% in the PDT/IVR group and 78.9% in the PDT/IVA group with no significant difference between the two groups.

conclusionsPDT combined with either IVR or IVA was well tolerated and appeared to improve both vision and anatomy in patients with PCV. PDT/IVA may have a more pronounced effect on macular choroidal thickness at 1-year follow-up.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsChoroidChoroid DiseasesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsLasersMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsRanibizumabafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsPhotosensitizing AgentsRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVerteporfin

Identifiers

PMID32579608
PMCPMC7313742
OpenAlexW3037852336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.