ArticlePloS one2020
Repeat induces not only gene silencing, but also gene activation in mammalian cells.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cryptic promoter in the exon of HKR1 drives expression of a truncated form of Hkr1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.PloS one · 2024Article
- Rapid Macrosatellite Evolution Promotes X-Linked Hybrid Male Sterility in a Feline Interspecies Cross.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repeat-induced gene silencing (RIGS) establishes the centromere structure, prevents the spread of transposons and silences transgenes, thereby limiting recombinant protein production. We previously isolated a sequence (B-3-31) that alleviates RIGS from the human genome. Here, we developed an assay system for evaluating the influence of repeat sequences on gene expression, based on in vitro ligation followed by our original gene amplification technology in animal cells. Using this assay, we found that the repeat of B-3-31, three core sequences of replication initiation regions (G5, C12, and D8) and two matrix attachment regions (AR1 and 32-3), activated the co-amplified plasmid-encoded d2EGFP gene in both human and hamster cell lines. This upregulation effect persisted for up to 82 days, which was confirmed to be repeat-induced, and was thus designated as a repeat-induced gene activation (RIGA). In clear contrast, the repeat of three bacterial sequences (lambda-phage, Amp, and ColE1) and three human retroposon sequences (Alu, 5'-untranslated region, and ORF1 of a long interspersed nuclear element) suppressed gene expression, thus reflecting RIGS. RIGS was CpG-independent. We suggest that RIGA might be associated with replication initiation. The discovery of RIGS and RIGA has implications for the repeat in mammalian genome, as well as practical value in recombinant production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.