ArticlePloS one2020
Adhesion of streptococci to titanium and zirconia.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Sol-Gel Zirconia-Silver Coating for Titanium Implants: Assessing Biocompatibility, Osseointegration, and Enhanced Short-Term Antibacterial Efficacy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Surface-related factors affecting bacterial adhesion on dental implants: a short literature review.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Review
- Development of a Coculture Model for Assessing Competing Host Mammalian Cell and Bacterial Attachment on Zirconia versus Titanium.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Modular Titanium Alloy Plates for Osteosynthesis of the Jawbone.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Enhanced Bacterial and Biofilm Adhesion Resistance of ALD Nano-TiOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- Antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of silver coating via aerosol deposition on titanium and zirconia surfaces.International journal of implant dentistry · 2023Article
- The effect of surface material, roughness and wettability on the adhesion and proliferation ofJournal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Overview of strategies to improve the antibacterial property of dental implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Effects of 2% sodium fluoride solution on the prevention of streptococcal adhesion to titanium and zirconia surfaces.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adherence of streptococci to disks of titanium (commercially pure titanium: CpTi) and zirconia (tetragonal zirconia polycrystals: TZP). CpTi and yttria-stabilized TZP disks with a mirror-polished surface were used as specimens. The arithmetic mean surface roughness (Ra and Sa) and the surface wettability of the experimental specimens were measured. For analyzing the outermost layer of the experimental specimens, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed. Streptococcus sanguinis, S. gordonii, S. oralis, and S. mutans were used as streptococcal bacterial strains. These bacterial cultures were grown for 24 h on CpTi and TZP. The number of bacterial adhesions was estimated using an ATP-bioluminescent assay, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation of the adhered bacterial specimens was performed. No significant differences in surface roughness or wettability were found between CpTi and TZP. In XPS analyses, outermost layer of CpTi included Ti0 and Ti4+, and outermost layer of TZP included Zr4+. In the cell adhesion assay, the adherences of S. sanguinis, S. gordonii, and S. oralis to TZP were significantly lower than those to CpTi (p < 0.05); however, significant difference was not observed for S. mutans among the specimens. The adherence to CpTi and TZP of S. mutans was significantly lower than that of S. sanguinis, S. gordonii, and S. oralis. These results were confirmed by SEM. S. sanguinis, S. gordonii, and S. oralis adhered less to TZP than to CpTi, but the adherence of S. mutans was similar to both surfaces. S. mutans was less adherent compare with the other streptococci tested in those specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.