Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579555›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Serotype-specific detection of dengue viruses in a nonstructural protein 1-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay validated with a multi-national cohort.

Irene Bosch, Ankita Reddy, Helena de Puig, Juan E Ludert, Federico Perdomo-Celis, Carlos F Narváez, Alice Versiani, Diana Fandos, Mauricio L Nogueira, Mohit Singla and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Irene BoschE25Bio, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1352-5888
Ankita ReddyE25Bio, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4986-8719
Helena de PuigInstitute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Juan E LudertDepartamento de Infectómica y Patogénesis Molecular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Ciudad de México, México.
Federico Perdomo-CelisPrograma de Medicina, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia.
Carlos F NarváezPrograma de Medicina, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-5210
Alice VersianiDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Diana FandosInstitute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mauricio L NogueiraFaculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.
Mohit SinglaDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh LodhaDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Guruprasad R MedigeshiTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.
Ivette LorenzanaInstituto de Investigación en Microbiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
Hugo Vicente RaldeFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Margarita Gélvez-RamírezUniversidad Industrial de Santander and AEDES Network, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.
Luis A VillarUniversidad Industrial de Santander and AEDES Network, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.
Megan HileyInstitute for Medical Engineering & Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Laura MendozaE25Bio, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-3462
Nol SalcedoE25Bio, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Bobby Brooke HerreraE25Bio, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lee GehrkeE25Bio, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INFaculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto · BRIndustrial University of Santander · COUniversidad Surcolombiana · COCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXInstitut Químic de Sarrià · ESNational Autonomous University of Honduras · HNTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · INUniversidad Autónoma de Guadalajara · MX

Funding

INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND BASIC MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMST32AI007061 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Marcia B Goldberg · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue virus (DENV) infections pose one of the largest global barriers to human health. The four serotypes (DENV 1-4) present different symptoms and influence immune response to subsequent DENV infections, rendering surveillance, risk assessments, and disease control particularly challenging. Early diagnosis and appropriate clinical management is critical and can be achieved by detecting DENV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) in serum during the acute phase. However, few NS1-based tests have been developed that are capable of differentiating DENV serotypes and none are currently commercially available. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE

findingsWe developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to distinguish DENV-1-4 NS1 using serotype-specific pairs of monoclonal antibodies. A total of 1,046 antibodies were harvested from DENV-immunized mice and screened for antigen binding affinity. ELISA clinical performance was evaluated using 408 polymerase chain reaction-confirmed dengue samples obtained from patients in Brazil, Honduras, and India. The overall sensitivity of the test for pan-DENV was 79.66% (325/408), and the sensitivities for DENV-1-4 serotyping were 79.1% (38/48), 80.41% (78/97), 100% (45/45), and 79.6% (98/123), respectively. Specificity reached 94.07-100%. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates a robust antibody screening strategy that enabled the development of a serotype NS1-based ELISA with maximized specific and sensitive antigen binding. This sensitive and specific assay also utilized the most expansive cohort to date, and of which about half are from Latin America, a geographic region severely underrepresented in previous similar studies. This ELISA test offers potential enhanced diagnostics during the acute phase of infection to help guide patient care and disease control. These results indicate that this ELISA is a promising aid in early DENV-1-4 diagnosis and surveillance in regions of endemicity in addition to offer convenient monitoring for future vaccine interventions.

Indexed as

SerogroupAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralBrazilCohort StudiesDengueDengue VirusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHondurasHumansIndiaLatin AmericaMice, Inbred C57BLSensitivity and SpecificityViral Nonstructural ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralViral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32579555
PMCPMC7351204
OpenAlexW3037721491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.