Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579409›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

The neural foundations of handedness: insights from a rare case of deafferentation.

S A L Jayasinghe, F R Sarlegna, R A Scheidt, R L Sainburg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03298243 (Augmenting Kinesthetic Feedback to Improve Hemiparetic Arm Control After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03298243 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Augmenting Kinesthetic Feedback to Improve Hemiparetic Arm Control After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarquette UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsStroke, Proprioceptive DisordersArmsVibrotactile stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S A L JayasingheDepartment of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-5170
F R SarlegnaAix Marseille Université, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7718-7286
R A ScheidtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-2024-5051
R L SainburgDepartment of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Predicting Ipsilesional Motor Deficits in Stroke with Dynamic Dominance ModelR01HD059783 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SAINBURG, ROBERT L, WINSTEIN, CAROLEE J · 2010 to 2023
$5.3M
Control of Arm Posture and Movement Followoing StrokeR01HD053727 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIDT, ROBERT A. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Augmenting kinesthetic feedback to improve hemiparetic arm control after strokeR15HD093086 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIDT, ROBERT A. · 2017 to 2021
$897k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053727NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059783NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD093086NIH HHS R01HD059783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of proprioceptive feedback on motor lateralization remains unclear. We asked whether motor lateralization is dependent on proprioceptive feedback by examining a rare case of proprioceptive deafferentation (GL). Motor lateralization is thought to arise from asymmetries in neural organization, particularly at the cortical level. For example, we have previously provided evidence that the left hemisphere mediates optimal motor control that allows execution of smooth and efficient arm trajectories, while the right hemisphere mediates impedance control that can achieve stable and accurate final arm postures. The role of proprioception in both of these processes has previously been demonstrated empirically, bringing into question whether loss of proprioception will disrupt lateralization of motor performance. In this study, we assessed whether the loss of online sensory information produces deficits in integrating specific control contributions from each hemisphere by using a reaching task to examine upper limb kinematics in GL and five age-matched controls. Behavioral findings revealed differential deficits in the control of the left and right hands in GL and performance deficits in each of GL's hands compared with controls. Computational simulations can explain the behavioral results as a disruption in the integration of postural and trajectory control mechanisms when no somatosensory information is available. This rare case of proprioceptive deafferentation provides insights into developing a more accurate understanding of handedness that emphasizes the role of proprioception in both predictive and feedback control mechanisms.

Indexed as

AgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMotor ActivityNeurons, AfferentPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesProprioceptionSensation DisordersUpper Extremitycomplementary dominancelateralizationmotor controlproprioception

Identifiers

PMID32579409
PMCPMC7474455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.