Trial reportThe British journal of radiology2020
Comparison of
Trial report in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03781284 (Positron Emission Tomography With 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Combined With MRI for Monitoring Inflammatory Activity in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Positron Emission Tomography With 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Combined With MRI for Monitoring Inflammatory Activity in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue Eosinophilia of the Colonic Mucosa as a Potential Early Predictor of Failure to Achieve Clinical Remission in Ulcerative Colitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis: A Machine Learning and Nomogram-Based Approach.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Potential applications of PET/MRI in non-oncologic conditions within the abdomen and pelvis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- PET Imaging of System xJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- Construction and imaging of a neurovascular unit model.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- Diagnostic Performance of Simultaneous [Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of fecal biomarkers and
methodsThis study was conducted under the framework of a single-center clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov [NCT03781284]).
resultsAccording to EAI,
conclusionBoth fecal biomarkers and PET-MR were excellent non-invasive diagnostic tools in the assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Both fecal biomarkers and PET-MR parameters are able to predict endoscopically active disease with comparable diagnostic performance. PET had the highest correlation with endoscopy and outperformed fecal biomarkers in differentiating moderate to severe from mild disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.