Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32579152›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Relationship between genetic knowledge and familial communication of CRC risk and intent to communicate CRCP genetic information: insights from FamilyTalk eMERGE III.

Sukh Makhnoon, Deborah J Bowen, Brian H Shirts, Stephanie M Fullerton, Hendrika W Meischke, Eric B Larson, James D Ralston, Kathleen Leppig, David R Crosslin, David Veenstra and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sukh MakhnoonDepartment of Behavioral Science, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Deborah J BowenDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian H ShirtsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephanie M FullertonDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Hendrika W MeischkeDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eric B LarsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
James D RalstonGenetic Services, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kathleen LeppigGenetic Services, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
David R CrosslinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
David VeenstraDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gail P JarvikDepartments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Variation, Function, and Disease Supplement ProgramU01HG008657 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI David Russell Crosslin, Gail Pairitz Jarvik · 2015 to 2026
$13.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful translation of genetic information into patient-centered care and improved outcomes depends, at least in part, on patients' genetic knowledge. Although genetic knowledge is believed to be an important facilitator of familial communication of genetic risk information, empirical evidence of this association is lacking. We examined whether genetic knowledge was related to frequency of current familial communication about colorectal cancer and polyp (CRCP) risk, and future intention to share CRCP-related genomic test results with family members in a clinical sample of patients. We recruited 189 patients eligible for clinical CRCP sequencing to the eMERGE III FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial and surveyed them about genetic knowledge and familial communication at baseline. Participants were primarily Caucasian, 47% male, average age of 68 years, mostly well educated, and with high-income levels. Genetic knowledge was positively associated with future-intended familial communication of genetic information (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.23), but not associated with current communication of CRC risk (β = 0.01, p = .58). Greater current communication of CRC risk was associated with better family functioning (β = 0.04, p = 8.2e-5). Participants' genetic knowledge in this study was minimally associated with their intended familial communication of genetic information. Although participants have good intentions of communication, family-level factors may hinder actual follow through of these intentions. Continued focus on improving proband's genetic knowledge coupled with interventions to overcome family-level barriers to communication may be needed to improve familial communication rates.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntentionAgedCommunicationFamilyFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsCancerCommunication intentionFamilial communicationGenetic knowledge

Identifiers

PMID32579152
PMCPMC7963296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.