Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32578864›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons.

Daniel A Ortiz, Mayur R Shukla, Michael J Loeffelholz

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trend in the detection rate of syphilis among older adults: time series analysis, Brazil, 2014-2023.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison between treponemal and non-treponemal tests for syphilis detectionBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network National Syphilis In-Laboratory Serological Testing Recommendations.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel A OrtizDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Mayur R ShuklaDivision of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Michael J LoeffelholzDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question "What diagnostic considerations should be taken into account when screening for syphilis using the traditional or reverse algorithm?" Improved laboratory diagnosis of syphilis is an important element of the effort to reduce syphilis rates. Screening for syphilis is performed using either a nontreponemal or treponemal test (part of the traditional or reverse algorithm, respectively). Both syphilis algorithms are used by laboratories. However, there are limited data on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the algorithms. An expert panel generated "key questions" in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. This paper pertains to the key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the traditional or the reverse algorithm. A systematic literature review was performed, and tables of evidence were created to address this question.

Indexed as

SyphilisAlgorithmsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMass ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumdiagnostic algorithmsserologysyphilisTreponema pallidum

Identifiers

PMID32578864
PMCPMC7312234
OpenAlexW3037077308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.