ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020
Retrospective study of immunization errors reported in an online Information System.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feature representation in analysing childhood vaccination defaulter risk predictors: A scoping review of studies in low-resource settings.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Geopharmacosurveillance of reporting rates of events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization against COVID-19.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Immunization errors of COVID-19 vaccines in Minas Gerais.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Prevalence and underreporting of immunization errors in childhood vaccination: results of a household survey.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2024Article
- Adverse event following immunization or vaccination in children in Minas Gerais: 2015 to 2020.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Construction and validity of an educational video to prevent immunization errors.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Incidence of immunization errors in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil: a cross-sectional study, 2015-2019.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto analyze the immunization errors reported in an online Information System.
methodretrospective study conducted with data from the Adverse Event Following Immunization Surveillance Information System. Immunization errors were analyzed with respect to demographic characteristics and the vaccination process. Frequencies and error incidence rates have been calculated. Binomial and chi-square tests were used to verify differences in the proportions of the variables.
results501 errors were analyzed, the majority involving routine doses (92.6%), without Adverse Event Following Immunization (90.6%) and in children under five years old (55.7%). The most frequent types of errors were inadequacy in the indication of the immunobiological (26.9%), inadequate interval between doses (18.2%) and error in the administration technique (14.2%). The overall error incidence rate was 4.05/100,000 doses applied; the highest incidences of routine vaccines were for human rabies vaccine, human papillomavirus and triple viral; the incidence rate of errors with Adverse Events Following Immunization was 0.45/100,000 doses applied.
conclusionit was found that immunization errors are a reality to be faced by the health systems, but they are amenable to prevention through interventions such as the adoption of protocols, checklists and permanent education in health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.