ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials2020
Handling and performance characteristics of a new small caliber radiopaque embolic microsphere.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practical in-syringe mixing method for uniform particle delivery during embolization procedures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- In vitro characterization of immune modulating drug-eluting immunobeads towards transarterial embolization in cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Evaluation of immune-modulating drugs for use in drug-eluting microsphere transarterial embolization.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Drug-eluting embolic microspheres: State-of-the-art and emerging clinical applications.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2021Review
- Handling and performance characteristics of a new small caliber radiopaque embolic microsphere.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The in vitro and in vivo handling and performance characteristics of a small caliber radiopaque embolic microsphere, 40-90 μm DC Bead LUMI™ (LUMI40-90), were studied. Microsphere drug loading and elution and effects on size, suspension, and microcatheter delivery were evaluated using established in vitro methodologies. In vivo evaluations of vascular penetration (rabbit renal artery embolization), long-term biocompatibility and X-ray imaging properties, pharmacokinetics and local tissue effects of both doxorubicin (Dox) and irinotecan (Iri) loaded microspheres (swine hepatic artery embolization) were conducted. Compared to 70-150 μm DC Bead LUMI (LUMI70-150), LUMI40-90 averaged 70 μm versus 100 μm, which was unchanged upon drug loading. Handling, suspension, and microsphere delivery studies were successfully performed. Dox loading was faster (20 min) and Iri equivalent (<10 min) while drug elution rates were similar. Contrast suspension times were longer with no delivery complications. Vascular penetration was statistically greater (rabbit) with no unexpected adverse safety findings (swine). Microspheres ± drug were visible under X-ray imaging (CT) at 90 days. Peak plasma drug levels and area under the curve were greater for LUMI40-90 compared to LUMI70-150 but comparable to 70-150 μm DC BeadM1™ (DC70-150). Local tissue effects showed extensive hepatic necrosis for Dox, whereas Iri displayed lower toxicity with more pronounced lobar fibrosis. LUMI40-90 remains suspended for longer and have greater vessel penetration compared to the other DC Bead LUMI sizes and are similarly highly biocompatible with long-term visibility under X-ray imaging. Drug loading is equivalent or faster with pharmacokinetics similar to DC70-150 for both Dox and Iri.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.