Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32578157›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2020

Detecting Medicine Safety Signals Using Prescription Sequence Symmetry Analysis of a National Prescribing Data Set.

Clare E King, Nicole L Pratt, Nichole Craig, Loc Thai, Margaret Wilson, Neillan Nandapalan, Lisa Kalisch Ellet, Eirene C Behm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clare E KingTherapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT, Australia. clare.king@health.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6336-5459
Nicole L PrattQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8730-8910
Nichole CraigAustralian Government Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Loc ThaiAustralian Government Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Margaret WilsonTherapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-8852
Neillan NandapalanTherapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3182-6804
Lisa Kalisch ElletQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5063-6128
Eirene C BehmTherapeutic Goods Administration, Australian Government Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6506-1846
Australian Government · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1101788National Health and Medical Research Council GNT 1040938National Health and Medical Research Council GNT 1157506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedicine safety signal detection methods employed by the medicine regulator in Australia (Therapeutic Goods Administration [TGA], Department of Health) rely predominantly on analysis of spontaneous adverse event (AE) reports, sponsor notifications or information shared by international agencies. The limitations of these methods and the availability of large administrative health data sets has given rise to greater interest in the use of administrative health data to support pharmacovigilance (PV).

objectiveWe explored whether prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data can enhance signal detection by the TGA, using the AE, heart failure (HF) as a case study.

methodsWe applied the PSSA method to all single-ingredient medicines dispensed under the PBS between 2012 and 2016, using furosemide initiation as a proxy for new-onset HF. A signal was considered present if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the adjusted sequence ratio was > 1. We excluded medicines known to cause HF, indicated for HF treatment or indicated for diseases that may contribute to HF.

resultsOf the 654 tested medicines, 26 potential new HF signals were detected by PSSA. Five signals had additional support for the possible association provided by biological plausibility, consistency and disproportionate reporting of cases of HF to the TGA and the World Health Organization; and clinical impact.

conclusionPSSA was able to identify potential signals for further evaluation. With the increasing availability of different administrative health data sources, the strengths and weaknesses of methods used to analyse these data for the purpose of regulatory PV should be evaluated.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAustraliaConfidence IntervalsDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalDrug InteractionsDrug PrescriptionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHeart FailureHumansInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesPharmacovigilanceSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID32578157
OpenAlexW3037544236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.