Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32578042›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Wide Area Transepithelial Sampling with Computer-Assisted Analysis (WATS

Mendel E Singer, Michael S Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. WATSAnnals of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mendel E SingerDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael S SmithDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai West and Mount Sinai Morningside Hospitals, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Ambulatory Care Center, 13th Floor, 440 W 114th St., New York, NY, 10025, USA. michael.smith1@mountsinai.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7209-7118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWide area transepithelial sampling with three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (WATS

aimsTo examine the cost-effectiveness of adding WATS

methodsA decision analytic model was used to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two alternative BE screening strategies in chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease patients: FB with and without WATS

resultsBetween 320 and 337 people would need to be screened with WATS

conclusionsScreening for BE in 60-year-old white male GERD patients is more cost-effective when WATS

Indexed as

Health Care CostsBarrett EsophagusBiopsyComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEarly Detection of CancerEpithelial CellsEsophageal MucosaEsophageal NeoplasmsGastroesophageal RefluxHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedBarrett’s esophagusCost-effectivenessEsophageal diseaseRelative costs and outcomesScreening

Identifiers

PMID32578042
PMCPMC8053177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.