Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32578040›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2020

Sex-Based Considerations in the Evaluation of Chest Pain and Management of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Nidhi Madan, Eileen Gajo, Rupa M Sanghani, Annabelle Santos Volgman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nidhi MadanRush Heart Center for Women, Section of Cardiology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9472-4338
Eileen GajoRush Heart Center for Women, Section of Cardiology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Rupa M SanghaniRush Heart Center for Women, Section of Cardiology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Annabelle Santos VolgmanRush Heart Center for Women, Section of Cardiology, Rush Medical College, Rush University, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Annabelle_Volgman@rush.edu.
Rush University · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCoronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and poses a threat to both men and women across their lifespans. There is accumulating evidence to support that CAD may present differently in women and men, ranging from the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of the disease to underlying differences in the biological and pathophysiological mechanisms. This has called for an expansion of our conventional tools used in the diagnosis and management of obstructive CAD. Understanding these key sex differences will potentially help tailor our diagnostic and treatment strategies and provide equitable and optimal care to both men and women. RECENT

findingsNumerous studies have consistently shown that women with CAD tend to be older, have a higher burden of co-morbidities, and experience worse outcomes compared to their male counterparts. Women tend to wait longer to seek medical care for cardiovascular symptoms and when they do, they are usually referred late in the disease process and treated less aggressively. Women are significantly underrepresented in most cardiovascular clinical trials, thereby creating an important limitation in the evidence base used for treating cardiovascular disease in women. In this review, we sought to describe the sex-based considerations in evaluation and management of obstructive CAD, underscore the mechanisms behind these considerations, and help develop a more personalized approach according to current paradigms.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersChest PainComorbidityCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsYoung AdultBiomarkersChest painCoronary artery diseaseSex differencesWomen

Identifiers

PMID32578040
OpenAlexW3038097639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.