ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
Bioassay-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii in free-range chickens from Khorramabad, Iran: comparison of direct microscopy and semi-nested PCR.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular characterization and epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from free-range chickens in the southwest region of Goiás: new genotypes.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in free-range chickens from Khorramabad, western Iran, and also to compare the performance of direct microscopy and semi-nested PCR in mice bioassayed with tissues from seropositive chickens. We investigated 97 serum samples from free-range chickens, using the modified agglutination test (MAT). Tissues from all seropositive chickens (MAT ≥ 1:10) were bioassayed in mice. All inoculated mice were examined by direct microscopy and a semi-nested PCR targeting the 529 bp repeat element (RE) of the parasite. Anti-T. gondii antibodies were detected in 21.6% of chicken sera. Eighteen of 21 (85.7%) seropositive chickens were positive in mouse bioassay using molecular DNA detection. However, biological forms of the parasite were isolated only from 11 (52.3%) seropositive chickens. Compared with semi-nested PCR, the sensitivity of direct microscopy was 62.1%. It can be concluded that although direct microscopy is a rapid and specific method for the detection of T. gondii, it does not detect the parasite in all experimentally infected mice. The low sensitivity of direct microscopy highlights the need for molecular techniques, such as RE-based semi-nested PCR, to increase the sensitivity of the mouse bioassay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.