Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577994›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2020

Bioassay-based detection of Toxoplasma gondii in free-range chickens from Khorramabad, Iran: comparison of direct microscopy and semi-nested PCR.

Zahra Alizadeh-Sarabi, Zahra Pasandideh, Hamidreza Shokrani, Omid Dezfoulian

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular characterization and epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from free-range chickens in the southwest region of Goiás: new genotypes.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahra Alizadeh-SarabiDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
Zahra PasandidehDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
Hamidreza ShokraniDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. shokrani.hm@lu.ac.ir.
Omid DezfoulianDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
Lorestan University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in free-range chickens from Khorramabad, western Iran, and also to compare the performance of direct microscopy and semi-nested PCR in mice bioassayed with tissues from seropositive chickens. We investigated 97 serum samples from free-range chickens, using the modified agglutination test (MAT). Tissues from all seropositive chickens (MAT ≥ 1:10) were bioassayed in mice. All inoculated mice were examined by direct microscopy and a semi-nested PCR targeting the 529 bp repeat element (RE) of the parasite. Anti-T. gondii antibodies were detected in 21.6% of chicken sera. Eighteen of 21 (85.7%) seropositive chickens were positive in mouse bioassay using molecular DNA detection. However, biological forms of the parasite were isolated only from 11 (52.3%) seropositive chickens. Compared with semi-nested PCR, the sensitivity of direct microscopy was 62.1%. It can be concluded that although direct microscopy is a rapid and specific method for the detection of T. gondii, it does not detect the parasite in all experimentally infected mice. The low sensitivity of direct microscopy highlights the need for molecular techniques, such as RE-based semi-nested PCR, to increase the sensitivity of the mouse bioassay.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensDNA, ProtozoanLiquid BiopsyMiceMicroscopyMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalDNA, ProtozoanChickensIranMicroscopic cyst detectionMouse bioassayToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID32577994
OpenAlexW3036683944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.