Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577987›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2020

Impact of Soil Rhizobacteria Inoculation and Leaf-Chewing Insect Herbivory on Mentha piperita Leaf Secondary Metabolites.

Lorena Del Rosario Cappellari, Julieta Chiappero, Tamara Belén Palermo, Walter Giordano, Erika Banchio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorena Del Rosario CappellariINBIAS Instituto de Biotecnología Ambiental y Salud (CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto), Campus Universitario, 5800, Río Cuarto, Argentina.
Julieta ChiapperoINBIAS Instituto de Biotecnología Ambiental y Salud (CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto), Campus Universitario, 5800, Río Cuarto, Argentina.
Tamara Belén PalermoINBIAS Instituto de Biotecnología Ambiental y Salud (CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto), Campus Universitario, 5800, Río Cuarto, Argentina.
Walter GiordanoINBIAS Instituto de Biotecnología Ambiental y Salud (CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto), Campus Universitario, 5800, Río Cuarto, Argentina.
Erika BanchioINBIAS Instituto de Biotecnología Ambiental y Salud (CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto), Campus Universitario, 5800, Río Cuarto, Argentina. ebanchio@exa.unrc.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-587X
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT636-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary metabolites commonly play important physiological roles in plants and can be modified quantitatively and qualitatively by exposure to biotic and abiotic interactions. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and herbivory induce systemic resistance. In the present study, we analyzed the induction of secondary metabolites in peppermint plants in response to chewing insect herbivory on PGPR-inoculated Mentha piperita plants. The secondary metabolites of M. piperita plants were increased when plants were inoculated with PGPR and also exposed to caterpillar herbivory. It was found that the total essential oil yield in inoculated plants with insect damage was ~2.6-fold higher than in controls. The yield was similar to that of plants either damaged by insects or inoculated, indicating that there was no synergism. The same trend was observed for phenolic compounds. In contrast, VOC emissions were significantly higher in plants infested by insects, independent of whether they were inoculated. Insect damaged plants had 5.5 times higher monoterpene emissions than control plants, and ~ 2-fold higher emissions than on PGPR-inoculated plants without insects. To gain a better understanding of how herbivory on PGPR-inoculated plants can cause an increase in secondary metabolites of peppermint, we examined changes in plant defense hormones in inoculated plants after herbivory. We found that the combination of both treatments increased the endogenous jasmonic and salicylic acid levels to the same extent as in plants only inoculated or only insect-damaged. Because different interactions can alter the phytochemistry of plants such as M. piperita, this topic is both ecologically and economically relevant.

Indexed as

HerbivoryAnimalsBacillus amyloliquefaciensLarvaMentha piperitaMothsPlant LeavesPseudomonas putidaSecondary MetabolismSoil MicrobiologyEssential oilHerbivoryPeppermintRhizobacteriaSecondary metabolitesTotal phenolic compoundsVOC

Identifiers

PMID32577987
OpenAlexW3037376146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.