SynthesisNeuropsychology review2023
The Use of Electroencephalography as an Informative Tool in Assisting Early Clinical Management after Sport-Related Concussion: a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Objective Markers for Diagnosing Concussions: Beyond Blood Biomarkers and the Role of Real-Time Diagnostic Tools.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Weighted Coherence Analysis as a Window into the Neurophysiological Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Gait in People With Persistent Symptoms After Concussion.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2024Article
- Physical exercise for brain plasticity promotion an overview of the underlying oscillatory mechanism.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Overview of methods and available tools used in complex brain disorders.Open research Europe · 2023Review
- Dynamic cognitive inhibition in the context of frustration: Increasing racial representation of adolescent athletes using mobile community-engaged EEG methods.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Biofidelic dynamic compression of human cortical spheroids reproduces neurotrauma phenotypes.Disease models & mechanisms · 2021Article
- Brain Vital Signs in Elite Ice Hockey: Towards Characterizing Objective and Specific Neurophysiological Reference Values for Concussion Management.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Updated Review of Neurologic Concussion Biomarkers for Time-sensitive Point-of-care Testing.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sport-related concussion (SRC) is managed primarily through serial clinical evaluations throughout recovery. However, studies suggest that clinical measures may not be suitable to detect subtle alterations in functioning and are limited by numerous internal and external factors. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used for over eight decades to discern altered function following illnesses and injuries, including traumatic brain injury. This study evaluated the associations between EEG measures and clinical presentation within three-months following SRC. A systematic review of the literature was performed in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines, yielding a total of 13 peer-reviewed articles. Most studies showed low to moderate bias and moderate to high quality. The majority of the existing literature on the impact of concussion within the first 3 months post-injury suggests that individuals with concussion show altered brain function, with EEG abnormalities outlasting clinical dysfunction. Of all EEG biomarkers evaluated, P300 shows the most promise and should be explored further. Despite the relatively high quality of included articles, significant limitations are still present within this body of literature, including potential conflicts of interest and proprietary algorithms, making it difficult to draw strong and meaningful conclusions on the use of EEG in the early stages of SRC. Therefore, further exploration of the relationship between EEG measures and acute clinical presentation is warranted to determine if EEG provides additional benefits over current clinical assessments and is a feasible tool in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32577950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.