Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577873›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2020

Pesticides Hazardous Hotspots: Empirical Evidences from North India.

Rajinder Peshin, Baljeet S Hansra, Rakesh Nanda, Kuldeep Singh, Rakesh Sharma, Lavleesh Garg, Mangla R Bajiya, Abid Showkat, Raj Kumar, Stanzin Yangsdon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rajinder PeshinSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India. rpeshin@rediffmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-1402
Baljeet S HansraAmity University, Uttar Pradesh, Noida, 201313, India.
Rakesh NandaSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India.
Kuldeep SinghPunjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Rakesh SharmaSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India.
Lavleesh GargPunjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India.
Mangla R BajiyaSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India.
Abid ShowkatSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India.
Raj KumarSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India.
Stanzin YangsdonSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Chatha, Jammu, 180009, India.
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu · INPunjab Agricultural University · INAmity University · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research ICAR Extramural Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pesticide use in Indian agriculture showed a declining trend in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Since 2007, pesticide use gained an upward trend. To study the pesticide use pattern and identify pesticide hotspots, we collected data from a sample of 1201 apple, rice, vegetable, and cotton growers from the temperate Kashmir Valley, subtropical Jammu, and Punjab. Our study provided some interesting empirical results: prophylactic pesticide applications in apple crop making it a pesticide guzzler [25.2 kg of active ingredient (ai)/ha] with use of riskiest carcinogen pesticides (9 kg of a.i/ha) and field use environmental impact quotient (FEIQ) (620.4/ha) being the highest, the Kashmir Valley is the "pesticide hottest spot", followed by cotton and rice areas of Punjab and vegetable cultivation in Jammu subtropics. Pesticides banned for use in vegetables, such as monocrotophos were also applied by farmers in vegetable crops. However, rice areas in Kashmir and Jammu were only treated with herbicides. The protective measures taken by farmers while mixing and applying pesticides were primitive, resulting in localized mild/moderate pesticide poisoning besides loss of consciousness. We also found that the official data on the pesticide use are underreported and hence unreliable. Our study shows that neither the pesticide use by mass nor the pesticide use frequency, in combination or alone, is the robust indicator to measure the pesticide hazardous hotspots; besides these, FEIQ and less hazardous pesticides that are not probable or possible carcinogen should be rather used in conjunction.

Indexed as

PesticidesAgricultureCrops, AgriculturalFarmersHumansIndiaPesticidesEnvironmental impactPesticide hazardsPesticide hotspotsPesticide policyPesticide use in agricultureUse of riskiest pesticides

Identifiers

PMID32577873
OpenAlexW3038060325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.