Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577798›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2020

IConMHC: a deep learning convolutional neural network model to predict peptide and MHC-I binding affinity.

Baikang Pei, Yi-Hsiang Hsu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Unbiased avidity-based isolation of antigen-specific T cells.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Baikang PeiAmgen Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yi-Hsiang HsuAmgen Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. yhsu@amgen.com.
Amgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-specific neoantigens are mutated self-peptides presented by tumor cell major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and are necessary to elicit host's anti-cancer cytotoxic T cell responses. It could be specifically recognized by neoantigen-specific T cell receptors (TCRs). However, current wet-lab assays for identifying peptide MHC binding are too expensive and time-consuming to meet the clinical needs. In this study, we developed an in silico method with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model, iConMHC, to predict peptide MHC binding affinity. Unlike other in silico methods that only learn from properties of amino acid in neoantigen peptides alone and/or MHCs alone, iConMHC learns from physical and chemical interaction properties between pairwise amino acids from the two molecules. These properties, such as contact potentials and distances in folded proteins, directly affect neoantigen-MHC binding affinity. In addition, IConMHC is a pan-allele model that is capable of making predictions for all the MHC alleles. Even for those rare MHC alleles without training data, iConMHC can make predictions with reasonable accuracy. We benchmarked iConMHC with other commonly used MHC-I binding predictors and found our model performs better than most of the pan-allele models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAllelesAmino Acid SequenceAntigens, NeoplasmComputer SimulationDatabases, ProteinHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPeptidesProtein BindingReproducibility of ResultsAntigens, NeoplasmHistocompatibility Antigens Class IPeptidesConvolutional neural networkDeep learningImmuno-oncologyPeptide MHC-I binding

Identifiers

PMID32577798
OpenAlexW3038053523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.