Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577779›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Diagnostic options for blunt abdominal trauma.

Gerhard Achatz, Kerstin Schwabe, Sebastian Brill, Christoph Zischek, Roland Schmidt, Benedikt Friemert, Christian Beltzer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerhard AchatzDepartment for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sportstraumatology, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany. GerhardAchatz@Bundeswehr.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-5913
Kerstin SchwabeDepartment for General-, Visceral- and Thoracic-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Sebastian BrillDepartment for General-, Visceral- and Thoracic-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Christoph ZischekDepartment for Vascular- and Endovascular-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Roland SchmidtDepartment for General-, Visceral- and Thoracic-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Benedikt FriemertDepartment for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive and Septic Surgery, Sportstraumatology, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Christian BeltzerDepartment for General-, Visceral- and Thoracic-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Bundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysical examination, laboratory tests, ultrasound, conventional radiography, multislice computed tomography (MSCT), and diagnostic laparoscopy are used for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma. In this article, we investigate and evaluate the usefulness and limitations of various diagnostic modalities on the basis of a comprehensive review of the literature.

methodsWe searched commonly used databases in order to obtain information about the aforementioned diagnostic modalities. Relevant articles were included in the literature review. On the basis of the results of our comprehensive analysis of the literature and a current case, we offer a diagnostic algorithm.

resultsA total of 86 studies were included in the review. Ecchymosis of the abdominal wall (seat belt sign) is a clinical sign that has a high predictive value. Laboratory values such as those for haematocrit, haemoglobin, base excess or deficit, and international normalised ratio (INR) are prognostic parameters that are useful in guiding therapy. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) has become a well established component of the trauma room algorithm but is of limited usefulness in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. Compared with all other diagnostic modalities, MSCT has the highest sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic laparoscopy is an invasive technique that may also serve as a therapeutic tool and is particularly suited for haemodynamically stable patients with suspected hollow viscus injuries.

conclusionsMSCT is the gold standard diagnostic modality for blunt abdominal trauma because of its high sensitivity and specificity in detecting relevant intra-abdominal injuries. In many cases, however, clinical, laboratory and imaging findings must be interpreted jointly for an adequate evaluation of a patient's injuries and for treatment planning since these data supplement and complement one another. Patients with blunt abdominal trauma should be admitted for clinical observation over a minimum period of 24 h since there is no investigation that can reliably rule out intra-abdominal injuries.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesFocused Assessment with Sonography for TraumaWounds, NonpenetratingHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyBlunt abdominal traumaDiagnostic laparoscopyFASTHollow viscus injuryMSCTRadiography

Identifiers

PMID32577779
OpenAlexW3036176939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.