Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577672›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2020

Estimation of effects of contact tracing and mask adoption on COVID-19 transmission in San Francisco: a modeling study.

Lee Worden, Rae Wannier, Seth Blumberg, Alex Y Ge, George W Rutherford, Travis C Porco

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lee WordenFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rae WannierFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Seth BlumbergFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alex Y GeDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
George W RutherfordDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Travis C PorcoFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Ebola modeling: behavior, asymptomatic infection, and contacts (2019-nCoV Admin Supplement)R01GM130900 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PORCO, TRAVIS CHRISTIAN · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic has spurred concern about what interventions may be effective at reducing transmission. The city and county of San Francisco imposed a shelter-in-place order in March 2020, followed by use of a contact tracing program and a policy requiring use of cloth face masks. We used statistical estimation and simulation to estimate the effectiveness of these interventions in San Francisco. We estimated that self-isolation and other practices beginning at the time of San Francisco's shelter-in-place order reduced the effective reproduction number of COVID-19 by 35.4% (95% CI, -20.1%-81.4%). We estimated the effect of contact tracing on the effective reproduction number to be a reduction of approximately 44% times the fraction of cases that are detected, which may be modest if the detection rate is low. We estimated the impact of cloth mask adoption on reproduction number to be approximately 8.6%, and note that the benefit of mask adoption may be substantially greater for essential workers and other vulnerable populations, residents return to circulating outside the home more often. We estimated the effect of those interventions on incidence by simulating counterfactual scenarios in which contact tracing was not adopted, cloth masks were not adopted, and neither contact tracing nor cloth masks was adopted, and found increases in case counts that were modest, but relatively larger than the effects on reproduction numbers. These estimates and model results suggest that testing coverage and timing of testing and contact tracing may be important, and that modest effects on reproduction numbers can nonetheless cause substantial effects on case counts over time.

Indexed as

CaliforniaContact tracingCOVID-19PPESan Francisco

Identifiers

PMID32577672
PMCPMC7302226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.