Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577628›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2017

Interpretable Predictions of Clinical Outcomes with An Attention-based Recurrent Neural Network.

Ying Sha, May D Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Automatic Identification of Depression Using Facial Images with Deep Convolutional Neural Network.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Interpretable disease prediction using heterogeneous patient records with self-attentive fusion encoder.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Learning Predictive and Interpretable Timeseries Summaries from ICU Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying ShaSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
May D WangDept. of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332.

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing accumulation of healthcare data provides researchers with ample opportunities to build machine learning approaches for clinical decision support and to improve the quality of health care. Several studies have developed conventional machine learning approaches that rely heavily on manual feature engineering and result in task-specific models for health care. In contrast, healthcare researchers have begun to use deep learning, which has emerged as a revolutionary machine learning technique that obviates manual feature engineering but still achieves impressive results in research fields such as image classification. However, few of them have addressed the lack of the interpretability of deep learning models although interpretability is essential for the successful adoption of machine learning approaches by healthcare communities. In addition, the unique characteristics of healthcare data such as high dimensionality and temporal dependencies pose challenges for building models on healthcare data. To address these challenges, we develop a gated recurrent unit-based recurrent neural network with hierarchical attention for mortality prediction, and then, using the diagnostic codes from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, we evaluate the model. We find that the prediction accuracy of the model outperforms baseline models and demonstrate the interpretability of the model in visualizations.

Indexed as

attentiondeep learningelectronic health recordsHealth careinterpretabilityrecurrent neural networksvisualization

Identifiers

PMID32577628
PMCPMC7310714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.