Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577615›Full record

ArticleContraception: X2020

Comparison of pregnancy incidence among African women in a randomized trial of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), a copper intrauterine device (IUDs) or a levonorgestrel (LNG) implant for contraception.

Maricianah Onono, Kavita Nanda, Kate B Heller, Doug Taylor, Irina Yacobson, Renee Heffron, Margaret Phiri Kasaro, Cheryl E Louw, Zelda Nhlabasti, Thesla Palanee-Phillips and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Long-Term Outcomes of Implanon in Managing Adenomyosis: A 3-Year Prospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Maricianah OnonoKenya Medical Research Institute Center for Microbiology Research, P.O. Box 19464-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kavita NandaFHI 360, Durham, USA.
Kate B HellerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Doug TaylorFHI 360, Durham, USA.
Irina YacobsonFHI 360, Durham, USA.
Renee HeffronUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Margaret Phiri KasaroUNC Global Projects Zambia & University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Zambia.
Cheryl E LouwMadibeng Centre for Research, Brits, South Africa.
Zelda NhlabastiFamily Life Association of eSwatini & ICAP at Columbia University, eSwatini.
Thesla Palanee-PhillipsWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, School of Clinical Medicine, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jenni SmitUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Imelda WakhunguKenya Medical Research Institute Center for Microbiology Research, P.O. Box 19464-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Peter B GichangiInternational Center for Reproductive Health, Kenya.
Nelly R MugoKenya Medical Research Institute Center for Microbiology Research, P.O. Box 19464-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Charles MorrisonFHI 360, Durham, USA.
Jared M BaetenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium
Family Health International 360 · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Washington · USICAP Global HealthSeattle University · USTechnical University of Mombasa · KEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to address bias in contraception efficacy studies through a randomized study trial of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), a copper intrauterine device (IUDs) and a levonorgestrel (LNG) implant. STUDY

designWe analyzed data from the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes Trial, which assessed HIV incidence among 7829 women from 12 sites in eSwatini, Kenya, South Africa and Zambia seeking effective contraception and who consented to be randomized to DMPA-IM, copper IUD or LNG implant. We used Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for condom use to compare pregnancy incidence during both perfect and typical (i.e., allowing temporary interruptions) use.

resultsA total of 7710 women contributed to this analysis. Seventy pregnancies occurred during perfect and 85 during typical use. There was no statistically significant difference in perfect use pregnancy incidence among the methods: 0.61 per 100 woman-years for DMPA-IM [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.96], 1.06 for copper IUD (95% CI 0.72-1.50) and 0.63 for LNG implants (95% CI 0.39-0.96). Typical use pregnancy rates were also largely similar: 0.87 per 100 woman-years for DMPA-IM (95% CI 0.58-1.25), 1.11 for copper IUD (95% CI 0.77-1.54) and 0.63 for LNG implants (95% CI 0.39-0.96).

conclusionsIn this randomized trial of highly effective contraceptive methods among African women, both perfect and typical use resulted in low pregnancy rates. Our findings provide strong justification for improving access to a broader range of longer-acting contraceptive options including LNG implants and copper IUD for African women. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Data from this study support recommendations to providers, policy makers and patients that all of these methods provide safe and highly effective contraception for African women.

Indexed as

AfricaCopper intrauterine deviceHormonal contraceptionImplantsInjectablesPregnancy incidence

Identifiers

PMID32577615
PMCPMC7301167
OpenAlexW3031006544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.