ArticleACS applied nano materials2019
Entropic Trapping of DNA with a Nanofiltered Nanopore.
Article in ACS applied nano materials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Nanopore-Gated Subattoliter Silicon Nanocavity for Single-Molecule Trapping and Analysis without Applying an External Force.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Hybrid Microtubule-Solid-State Nanopores for Single-Molecule Analysis.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- Analysis of Nanopore Data: Classification Strategies for an Unbiased Curation of Single-Molecule Events from DNA Nanostructures.ACS sensors · 2023Article
- An interpretable deep learning approach for designing nanoporous silicon nitride membranes with tunable mechanical properties.npj computational materials · 2023Article
- Laser-based temperature control to study the roles of entropy and enthalpy in polymer-nanopore interactions.Science advances · 2021Article
- Engineering adjustable two-pore devices for parallel ion transport and DNA translocations.The Journal of chemical physics · 2021Article
- Chemically tailoring nanopores for single-molecule sensing and glycomics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Solid-state nanopore fabrication by automated controlled breakdown.Nature protocols · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elucidating the kinetics of DNA passage through a solid-state nanopore is a fertile field of research, and mechanisms for controlling capture, passage, and trapping of biopolymers are likely to find numerous technological applications. Here we present a nanofiltered nanopore device, which forms an entropic cage for DNA following first passage through the nanopore, trapping the translocated DNA and permitting recapture for subsequent reanalysis and investigation of kinetics of passage under confinement. We characterize the trapping properties of this nanodevice by driving individual DNA polymers into the nanoscale gap separating the nanofilter and the pore, forming an entropic cage similar to a "two pores in series" device, leaving polymers to diffuse in the cage for various time lengths, and attempting to recapture the same molecule. We show that the cage results in effectively permanent trapping when the radius of gyration of the target polymer is significantly larger than the radii of the pores in the nanofilter. We also compare translocation dynamics as a function of translocation direction in order to study the effects of confinement on DNA just prior to translocation, providing further insight into the nanopore translocation process. This nanofiltered nanopore device realizes simple fabrication of a femtoliter nanoreactor in which to study fundamental biophysics and biomolecular reactions on the single-molecule level. The device provides an electrically-permeable single-molecule trap with a higher entropic barrier to escape than previous attempts to fabricate similar structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.