ReviewHeliyon2020
Integration of microbubbles with biomaterials in tissue engineering for pharmaceutical purposes.
Review in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discussing the final size and shape of the reconstructed tissues in tissue engineering.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2023Review
- Bioactive Materials Promote Wound Healing through Modulation of Cell Behaviors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.Journal of biomedical science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering with the aid of biomaterials is a novel and promising knowledge aiming at improving human life expectancy. Besides, microbubbles are increasingly employed in biomedical applications due to their capability as a reservoir of therapeutic agents and oxygen molecules. In the present study, Microbubbles as the backbone of the research are produced as one of the potent devices in tissue engineering approaches, including drug delivery, wound healing, 3D printing, and scaffolding. It was shown that microbubbles are capable of promoting oxygen penetration and boosting the wound healing process by supplying adequate oxygen. Microbubbles also demonstrated their strength and potency in advancing drug delivery systems by reinforcing mass transfer phenomena. Furthermore, microbubbles developed the mechanical and biological characteristics of engineered scaffolds by manipulating the pores. Increasing cell survival, the biological activity of cells, angiogenesis, cell migration, and also nutrient diffusion into the inner layers of the scaffold were other achievements by microbubbles. In conclusion, the interest of biomedical communities in simultaneous usage of microbubbles and biomaterials under tissue engineering approaches experiences remarkable growth in Pharmaceutical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.