Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577458›Full record

ArticleData in brief2020

Dataset of annotated food crops and weed images for robotic computer vision control.

Kaspars Sudars, Janis Jasko, Ivars Namatevs, Liva Ozola, Niks Badaukis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaspars SudarsInstitute of Electronics and Computer Science, Dzērbenes str.14, Riga LV-1006, Latvia.
Janis JaskoInstitute for Plant Protection Research `Agrihorts', Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, P. Lejiņa str. 2, LV-3004 Jelgava, Latvia.
Ivars NamatevsInstitute of Electronics and Computer Science, Dzērbenes str.14, Riga LV-1006, Latvia.
Liva OzolaInstitute of Electronics and Computer Science, Dzērbenes str.14, Riga LV-1006, Latvia.
Niks BadaukisInstitute for Plant Protection Research `Agrihorts', Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, P. Lejiņa str. 2, LV-3004 Jelgava, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weed management technologies that can identify weeds and distinguish them from crops are in need of artificial intelligence solutions based on a computer vision approach, to enable the development of precisely targeted and autonomous robotic weed management systems. A prerequisite of such systems is to create robust and reliable object detection that can unambiguously distinguish weed from food crops. One of the essential steps towards precision agriculture is using annotated images to train convolutional neural networks to distinguish weed from food crops, which can be later followed using mechanical weed removal or selected spraying of herbicides. In this data paper, we propose an open-access dataset with manually annotated images for weed detection. The dataset is composed of 1118 images in which 6 food crops and 8 weed species are identified, altogether 7853 annotations were made in total. Three RGB digital cameras were used for image capturing: Intel RealSense D435, Canon EOS 800D, and Sony W800. The images were taken on food crops and weeds grown in controlled environment and field conditions at different growth stages.

Indexed as

Computer visionCrop growth and developmentImage annotationObject detectionPrecision agriculture

Identifiers

PMID32577458
PMCPMC7305380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.