ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2020
Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene editing enables non-invasiveMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- A Human-derived Dual MRI/PET Reporter Gene System with High Translational Potential for Cell Tracking.Molecular imaging and biology · 2022Article
- Valproic acid stimulates myogenesis in pluripotent stem cell-derived mesodermal progenitors in a NOTCH-dependent manner.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- A brief review of reporter gene imaging in oncolytic virotherapy and gene therapy.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cell-based therapies are a promising approach for the treatment of degenerative muscular diseases; however, clinical trials have shown inconclusive and even disappointing results so far. Noninvasive cell monitoring by medicine imaging could improve the understanding of the survival and biodistribution of cells following injection. In this study, we assessed the canine sodium iodide symporter (cNIS) reporter gene as an imaging tool to track by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) transduced canine myoblasts after intramuscular (IM) administrations in dogs. cNIS-expressing cells kept their myogenic capacities and showed strong
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.