Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577300›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2020

Developing and training mental toughness in sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and pre-test and post-test experiments.

Andreas Stamatis, Peter Grandjean, Grant Morgan, Robert Noah Padgett, Richard Cowden, Panagiotis Koutakis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of Mental Toughness among Basketball Sports School Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas StamatisDepartment of Sport and Wellness, SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9438-0558
Peter GrandjeanDepartment of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
Grant MorganDepartment of Educational Psychology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Robert Noah PadgettDepartment of Educational Psychology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
Richard CowdenDepartment of Psychology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa.
Panagiotis KoutakisDepartment of Nutrition, Food, and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Baylor University · USFlorida State University · USSUNY Plattsburgh · USUniversity of Mississippi · USUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of interventions designed to train and develop mental toughness (MT) in sport.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Journal articles, conference papers and doctoral theses indexed in Embase, Scopus, PubMed and SPORTDiscus from inception to 22 November 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Observational and pre-post experimental designs on the efficacy of physical and/or psychological interventions designed to promote MT in athletes.

resultsA total of 12 studies, published between 2005 and 2019, were included in the review. A majority of the studies included a sample comprised exclusively of male athletes (54.55%), MT interventions were primarily psychological (83.33%) and most studies measured MT via self-report (75%). The Psychological Performance Inventory (25%), the Mental Toughness Questionnaire-48 (16.67%), and the Mental, Emotional and Bodily Toughness Inventory (16.67%) were the most popular inventories used to measure MT. Methodological quality assessments for controlled intervention studies (

conclusionAlthough the findings of this review suggest there are effective, empirically based interventions designed to train MT in sport, practitioners should be aware of the level of validity of intervention research before adopting any of the MT training programmes reported in the applied sport psychology literature.

Indexed as

evidence-basedinterventionintervention effectivenessintervention efficacysport and exercise psychology

Identifiers

PMID32577300
PMCPMC7299040
OpenAlexW3034476258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.