Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32577039›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2020

Making Diagnostic Instruction Explicit in US Pharmacy Education.

Nicholas R Nelson, Mandy Jones, Lee G Wilbur, Frank Romanelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas R NelsonUniversity of North Carolina, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Mandy JonesUniversity of Kentucky, College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.
Lee G WilburCHI St. Vincent Infirmary, Department of Emergency Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Frank RomanelliUniversity of Kentucky, College of Pharmacy, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The profession of pharmacy and standards directing the education of student pharmacists are constantly evolving. The profession continues to emphasize patient-centered practice as a model for the future. The US health care system is faced with an impending shortage of primary care providers, which will affect the ability of patients to access the health care system. The pharmacy profession should position itself to contribute to meeting this need. The explicit instruction of differential diagnosis within Doctor of Pharmacy degree programs is a critical consideration in advancing pharmacy practice and potential contributions to the primary care gap.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineEducation, PharmacyPatient-Centered CarePharmaceutical ServicesPrimary Health CareProfessional RoleStudents, PharmacyDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansUnited Statesdiagnostic trainingdifferential diagnosispharmacy educationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32577039
PMCPMC7298214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.