Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576965›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2021

Precision weighting of cortical unsigned prediction error signals benefits learning, is mediated by dopamine, and is impaired in psychosis.

J Haarsma, P C Fletcher, J D Griffin, H J Taverne, H Ziauddeen, T J Spencer, C Miller, T Katthagen, I Goodyer, K M J Diederen and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J HaarsmaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
P C FletcherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
J D GriffinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
H J TaverneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
H ZiauddeenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-1719
T J SpencerDepartment of Psychosis studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
C MillerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
T KatthagenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
I GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
K M J Diederen *Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. kelly.diederen@kcl.ac.uk.
G K Murray *Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. gm285@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-1742
University of Cambridge · GBKing's College London · GBHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 095844/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent theories of cortical function construe the brain as performing hierarchical Bayesian inference. According to these theories, the precision of prediction errors plays a key role in learning and decision-making, is controlled by dopamine and contributes to the pathogenesis of psychosis. To test these hypotheses, we studied learning with variable outcome-precision in healthy individuals after dopaminergic modulation with a placebo, a dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine or a dopamine receptor antagonist sulpiride (dopamine study n = 59) and in patients with early psychosis (psychosis study n = 74: 20 participants with first-episode psychosis, 30 healthy controls and 24 participants with at-risk mental state attenuated psychotic symptoms). Behavioural computational modelling indicated that precision weighting of prediction errors benefits learning in health and is impaired in psychosis. FMRI revealed coding of unsigned prediction errors, which signal surprise, relative to their precision in superior frontal cortex (replicated across studies, combined n = 133), which was perturbed by dopaminergic modulation, impaired in psychosis and associated with task performance and schizotypy (schizotypy correlation in 86 healthy volunteers). In contrast to our previous work, we did not observe significant precision-weighting of signed prediction errors, which signal valence, in the midbrain and ventral striatum in the healthy controls (or patients) in the psychosis study. We conclude that healthy people, but not patients with first-episode psychosis, take into account the precision of the environment when updating beliefs. Precision weighting of cortical prediction error signals is a key mechanism through which dopamine modulates inference and contributes to the pathogenesis of psychosis.

Indexed as

DopaminePsychotic DisordersBayes TheoremBrainHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardDopamine

Identifiers

PMID32576965
PMCPMC8589669
OpenAlexW3036131087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.