Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576920›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Six Almond Species (Prunus spp. L.).

Wei Wang, Tao Yang, Hui-Ling Wang, Zhen-Jian Li, Jian-Wei Ni, Shang Su, Xin-Qiao Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterization of the Plastid Genomes of FourPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Chloroplast genome data of fiveData in brief · 2024
    Article
  6. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofCurrent genomics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Complete mitochondrial genome of the endangeredFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei WangKey Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, The Institute of Forestry, The Chinese Academy of Forestry, Yi He Yuan Hou, Beijing, 100091, China.
Tao YangShaanxi Academy of Forestry, Shaanxi, 719000, China.
Hui-Ling WangInstitute of Forestry and Pomology, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
Zhen-Jian LiKey Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, The Institute of Forestry, The Chinese Academy of Forestry, Yi He Yuan Hou, Beijing, 100091, China.
Jian-Wei NiKey Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, The Institute of Forestry, The Chinese Academy of Forestry, Yi He Yuan Hou, Beijing, 100091, China.
Shang SuKey Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, The Institute of Forestry, The Chinese Academy of Forestry, Yi He Yuan Hou, Beijing, 100091, China.
Xin-Qiao XuKey Laboratory of Silviculture of the State Forestry Administration, The Institute of Forestry, The Chinese Academy of Forestry, Yi He Yuan Hou, Beijing, 100091, China. greatkingww@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a source of genetic variation, almond germplasm resources are of great significance in breeding. To better reveal the mutation characteristics and evolution patterns of the almond chloroplast (cp) genome, the complete cp genomes from six almond species were analyzed. The lengths of the chloroplast genome of the six almond species ranged from 157,783 bp to 158,073 bp. For repeat sequence analysis, 53 pairs of repeats (30 bp or longer) were identified. A total of 117 SSR loci were observed, including 96 polymorphic SSR loci. Nine highly variable regions with a nucleotide variability (Pi) higher than 0.08, including rps16, rps16-psbK, atpF-atpH, rpoB, ycf3-rps4, rps4-ndhJ, accD-psaI and rps7-orf42 (two highly variable regions) were located. Based on the chloroplast genome evolution analysis, three species (P. tenella, P. pedunculata and P. triloba) and wild cherry (P. tomentosa) were grouped into clade I. Clade II consisted of two species (P. mongolica and P. tangutica) and wild peach (P. davidiana). Clade III included the common almond (P. dulcis), cultivated peach (P. persica) and GanSu peach (P. kansuensis). This result expands the researchers' vision of almond plant diversity and promotes an understanding of the evolutionary relationship among almond species. In brief, this study provides abundant resources for the study of the almond chloroplast genome, and has an important reference value for study of the evolution and species identification of almond.

Indexed as

PhylogenyEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome, ChloroplastMutationPrunus dulcisSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32576920
PMCPMC7311419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.