Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576878›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data.

Paul Gontarz, Shuhua Fu, Xiaoyun Xing, Shaopeng Liu, Benpeng Miao, Viktoriia Bazylianska, Akhil Sharma, Pamela Madden, Kitra Cates, Andrew Yoo and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving confidence of differential transcription calls in enhancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paul Gontarz *Department of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Shuhua Fu *Department of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Xiaoyun XingDepartment of Genetics, Center for Genomic Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-1775
Shaopeng LiuDepartment of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Benpeng MiaoDepartment of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Viktoriia BazylianskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Akhil SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Pamela MaddenDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Kitra CatesDepartment of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Andrew YooDepartment of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Anna MoszczynskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-2318
Ting WangDepartment of Genetics, Center for Genomic Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. twang@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-242X
Bo ZhangDepartment of Developmental Biology, Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. bzhang29@wustl.edu.

Funding

The WashU-UCSC-EBI Human Genome Reference Center."U41HG010972 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ira M Hall, Heng Li · 2019 to 2026
$24.9M
THE WASHU TARGET ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENOMICS DATA COORDINATION CENTERU24ES026699 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2016 to 2021
$5.2M
RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAM ON COMPUTATIONAL AND STATISTICAL TOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR ADDICTION GENETICSR25DA027995 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN, RICE, JOHN P. · 2009 to 2019
$4.3M
DECODING THE IMPACT OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS ON GENE REGULATIONR01HG007175 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2014 to 2021
$2.7M
Connecting transposable elements and regulatory innovation using ENCODE dataU01HG009391 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, BARAK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
The WashU 4DN Network Data Coordination and Integration CenterU01CA200060 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200060NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007175NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009391NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG010972NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA027995NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between different biological conditions is critical in determining the differential activity of regulatory elements. Differential analysis of ATAC-seq shares many similarities with differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. However, the distribution of ATAC-seq signal intensity is different from that of RNA-seq data, and higher sensitivity is required for DARs identification. Many different tools can be used to perform differential analysis of ATAC-seq data, but a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of these methods is still lacking. Here, we used simulated datasets to systematically measure the sensitivity and specificity of six different methods. We further discussed the statistical and signal density cut-offs in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq by applying them to real data. Batch effects are very common in high-throughput sequencing experiments. We illustrated that batch-effect correction can dramatically improve sensitivity in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq data. Finally, we developed a user-friendly package, BeCorrect, to perform batch effect correction and visualization of corrected ATAC-seq signals in a genome browser.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingDatabases, Nucleic AcidDatasets as TopicGene Regulatory NetworksHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSensitivity and SpecificityChromatin

Identifiers

PMID32576878
PMCPMC7311460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.