ArticleScientific reports2020
Quantifying Perfusion Properties with DCE-MRI Using a Dictionary Matching Approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microstructure-Informed Myelin Mapping (MIMM) from routine multi-echo gradient echo data using multiscale physics modeling of iron and myelin effects and QSM.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Simultaneous evaluation of perfusion and morphology using GRASP MRI in hepatic fibrosis.European radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perfusion properties can be estimated from pharmacokinetic models applied to DCE-MRI data using curve fitting algorithms; however, these suffer from drawbacks including the local minimum problem and substantial computational time. Here, a dictionary matching approach is proposed as an alternative. Curve fitting and dictionary matching were applied to simulated data using the dual-input single-compartment model with known perfusion property values and 5 in vivo DCE-MRI datasets. In simulation at SNR 60 dB, the dictionary estimate had a mean percent error of 0.4-1.0% for arterial fraction, 0.5-1.4% for distribution volume, and 0.0% for mean transit time. The curve fitting estimate had a mean percent error of 1.1-2.1% for arterial fraction, 0.5-1.3% for distribution volume, and 0.2-1.8% for mean transit time. In vivo, dictionary matching and curve fitting showed no statistically significant differences in any of the perfusion property measurements in any of the 10 ROIs between the methods. In vivo, the dictionary method performed over 140-fold faster than curve fitting, obtaining whole volume perfusion maps in just over 10 s. This study establishes the feasibility of using a dictionary matching approach as a new and faster way of estimating perfusion properties from pharmacokinetic models in DCE-MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.