Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576788›Full record

ArticleJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP

Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder in High-Risk Younger Siblings.

Kathryn Bradbury, Diana L Robins, Marianne Barton, Lisa V Ibañez, Wendy L Stone, Zachary E Warren, Deborah Fein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Comparison of Available Tools to Screen for Autism at 12 and 15 Months.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn BradburyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Diana L RobinsA.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Marianne BartonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Lisa V IbañezDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Wendy L StoneDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Zachary E WarrenVanderbilt Kennedy Center Treatment and Research Institute for ASD, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Deborah FeinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Washington · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Early Detection of Pervasive Developmental DisordersR01HD039961 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI ROBINS, DIANA L · 2002 to 2018
$11.5M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMost autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening measures have been developed for use with low-risk (LR) children; however, measures may perform differently in high-risk (HR) younger sibling populations. The current study sought to investigate the performance of an ASD screening measure, the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F), in a sample of HR younger siblings and directly compared its performance with that in an LR sample.

methodsHigh-risk younger siblings (n = 187) and LR children (n = 15,848) were screened using the M-CHAT-R/F. Screen-positive children completed comprehensive evaluations. The M-CHAT-R/F psychometric properties and clinical characteristics were compared across the samples.

resultsThe M-CHAT-R/F demonstrated a significantly higher screen-positive rate and ASD detection rate in the HR sample compared with the LR sample. Children with ASD in the HR sample had stronger verbal, nonverbal, and overall cognitive abilities compared with children with ASD in the LR sample despite comparable ASD severity and adaptive functioning. High positive predictive value of the M-CHAT-R at initial screen, with only incremental change after Follow-Up, suggests that Follow-Up is less critical in HR than LR samples. A significantly lower number of changed responses during Follow-Up further supports improved reporting accuracy of parents with ASD experience compared with parents less familiar with ASD.

conclusionThe findings suggest that the M-CHAT-R/F can distinguish between ASD and non-ASD at 18 to 24 months in an HR sibling sample, with performance comparable with or better than its performance in the general population.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChecklistHumansInfantMass ScreeningSiblings

Identifiers

PMID32576788
PMCPMC7572497
OpenAlexW3037700985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.