Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576689›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Repulsive guidance molecules lock growth differentiation factor 5 in an inhibitory complex.

Tomas Malinauskas, Tina V Peer, Benjamin Bishop, Thomas D Mueller, Christian Siebold

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomas MalinauskasDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, United Kingdom; tomas@strubi.ox.ac.uk mueller@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de christian@strubi.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-5529
Tina V PeerDepartment of Molecular Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Julius-von-Sachs Institute, University of Würzburg, 97082 Würzburg, Germany.
Benjamin BishopDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas D MuellerDepartment of Molecular Plant Physiology and Biophysics, Julius-von-Sachs Institute, University of Würzburg, 97082 Würzburg, Germany tomas@strubi.ox.ac.uk mueller@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de christian@strubi.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-7357
Christian SieboldDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, OX3 7BN Oxford, United Kingdom; tomas@strubi.ox.ac.uk mueller@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de christian@strubi.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6635-3621
Centre for Human Genetics · GBUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14414Cancer Research UK 26752Cancer Research UK C20724/A14414Cancer Research UK C20724/A26752Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203852/Z/16/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repulsive guidance molecules (RGMs) are cell surface proteins that regulate the development and homeostasis of many tissues and organs, including the nervous, skeletal, and immune systems. They control fundamental biological processes, such as migration and differentiation by direct interaction with the Neogenin (NEO1) receptor and function as coreceptors for the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/growth differentiation factor (GDF) family. We determined crystal structures of all three human RGM family members in complex with GDF5, as well as the ternary NEO1-RGMB-GDF5 assembly. Surprisingly, we show that all three RGMs inhibit GDF5 signaling, which is in stark contrast to RGM-mediated enhancement of signaling observed for other BMPs, like BMP2. Despite their opposite effect on GDF5 signaling, RGMs occupy the BMP type 1 receptor binding site similar to the observed interactions in RGM-BMP2 complexes. In the NEO1-RGMB-GDF5 complex, RGMB physically bridges NEO1 and GDF5, suggesting cross-talk between the GDF5 and NEO1 signaling pathways. Our crystal structures, combined with structure-guided mutagenesis of RGMs and BMP ligands, binding studies, and cellular assays suggest that RGMs inhibit GDF5 signaling by competing with GDF5 type 1 receptors. While our crystal structure analysis and in vitro binding data initially pointed towards a simple competition mechanism between RGMs and type 1 receptors as a possible basis for RGM-mediated GDF5 inhibition, further experiments utilizing BMP2-mimicking GDF5 variants clearly indicate a more complex mechanism that explains how RGMs can act as a functionality-changing switch for two structurally and biochemically similar signaling molecules.

Indexed as

Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Cell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalCrystallography, X-RayGPI-Linked ProteinsGrowth Differentiation Factor 5Hemochromatosis ProteinMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsProtein DomainsRecombinant ProteinsSignal TransductionBMP2 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Cell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalGDF5 protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsGrowth Differentiation Factor 5Hemochromatosis ProteinHJV protein, humanMembrane ProteinsneogeninNerve Tissue ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsRGMA protein, humanRGMB protein, humancell surface receptorNeogeninRepulsive guidance moleculestructural biologyTGFβ/BMP signaling

Identifiers

PMID32576689
PMCPMC7354924
OpenAlexW3037821717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.