Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32576247›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Evaluating hearing performance with cochlear implants within the same patient using daily randomization and imaging-based fitting - The ELEPHANT study.

L J G Lambriks, M van Hoof, J A Debruyne, M Janssen, J Chalupper, K A van der Heijden, J R Hof, C A Hellingman, E L J George, E M J Devocht

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03892941 (Electric Pace-pitched Hearing Achieves Natural Tonotopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03892941 naunknown statusnot on this map

Electric Pace-pitched Hearing Achieves Natural Tonotopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsDeafnessArmsImaged based fitting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L J G LambriksDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. lars.lambriks@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7633-6243
M van HoofDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J A DebruyneDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M JanssenDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J ChalupperAdvanced Bionics European Research Centre (AB ERC), Hannover, Germany.
K A van der HeijdenDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J R HofDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C A HellingmanDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E L J GeorgeDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E M J DevochtDepartment of ENT/Audiology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProspective research in the field of cochlear implants is hampered by methodological issues and small sample sizes. The ELEPHANT study presents an alternative clinical trial design with a daily randomized approach evaluating individualized tonotopical fitting of a cochlear implant (CI).

methodsA single-blinded, daily-randomized clinical trial will be implemented to evaluate a new imaging-based CI mapping strategy. A minimum of 20 participants will be included from the start of the rehabilitation process with a 1-year follow-up period. Based on a post-operative cone beam CT scan (CBCT), mapping of electrical input will be aligned to natural place-pitch arrangement in the individual cochlea. The CI's frequency allocation table will be adjusted to match the electrical stimulation of frequencies as closely as possible to corresponding acoustic locations in the cochlea. A randomization scheme will be implemented whereby the participant, blinded to the intervention allocation, crosses over between the experimental and standard fitting program on a daily basis, and thus effectively acts as his own control, followed by a period of free choice between both maps to incorporate patient preference. With this new approach the occurrence of a first-order carryover effect and a limited sample size is addressed. DISCUSSION: The experimental fitting strategy is thought to give rise to a steeper learning curve, result in better performance in challenging listening situations, improve sound quality, better complement residual acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear and be preferred by recipients of a CI. Concurrently, the suitability of the novel trial design will be considered in investigating these hypotheses.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03892941. Registered 27 March 2019.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsHearingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCochleaCochlear ImplantationCone-Beam Computed TomographyControlled Clinical Trials as TopicCross-Over StudiesElectric StimulationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesBimodal hearingCochlear implantDaily randomizationImaging based fittingTonotopy

Identifiers

PMID32576247
PMCPMC7310427
OpenAlexW3036788649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.